Saturday, 24 October 2015

(76) The Sexual Theory of Religion (Part 4: 180-300)


Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive





Assumption 180: Abraham and heaven. There is no heaven called in Genesis other than as ceiling of the earth. Also there is no mention of reincarnation into the earthly or in the parallel universe. And there is no evidence that Abraham, Isaac or God ever existed. But we do know the evolution of human religion follows logical laws. What means the level of abstraction of eternal life determines human religious development. Therefore, we interpret the myth of Abraham at best as the transition from earthly reincarnation to reincarnation into the parallel universe. The parallel universe is the final abstraction of eternal existence discovered by man.


Assumption 181: The actual sadistic god of Islamic culture is not Allah but are tribal gods from Paradise culture. In the beginning Allah was intended as an escape from male sadism just like Christianity. This worked through Jesus in exogamous cultures, but failed due to endogamy among Muslims. Allah, the women god from the SUPER EGO and tribal gods of the ID were contaminated and clashed on the level playing field of the EGO of Muslims.

What now is seen as Allah in the Koran and Sharia is a failed women god, which has been occupied by men. Hence Islam psychologically knows a male Allah who is dominant and a female Allah who describes the inner life of women. This all because in monotheism there can be only one God. Allah must be understood as a multiple personality in Islamic culture. This is the cause of the sexual imbalance between man and wife: SM-dyad.


Assumption 182: The meaning of heaven in Islam is the liberation of Muslim females from their men.


Assumption 183: There is one Koran and there is one Islam, but there are two Allahs, for males and females. Both gods are called 'Allah' because Islam is monotheistic. But the female Allah actually developed from genetic diversity and the male Allah from the genetic monoculture of inbreeding and incest. In polytheism there would be two gods, with different names, a male and a female god, for example 'God' and 'Jesus'. In evolution the Christian god changed from genetic monoculture to genetic diversity as result of Vanilla-dyad.



Assumptie 183: Er is één koran en er is één islam, maar er zijn twee Allah's, voor mannen en vrouwen. Beide(n) worden: 'Allah' genoemd omdat islam monotheïstisch is. Maar de vrouwelijke Allah ontwikkelde zich feitelijk uit genetische diversiteit en de mannelijke Allah vanuit de genetische monocultuur van incest en inteelt. In het polytheïsme zouden er twee goden zijn, met verschillende namen, een mannelijke en een vrouwelijke God, bijvoorbeeld God en Jezus. In de evolutie veranderde de christelijke god van genetische monocultuur in genetische diversiteit als gevolg van de Vanilla-dyade.


Assumption 184: Theoretical and practical evidence shows an interaction between Islamic culture and ethnicity. In a way one could say that Muslims differ fundamentally from non-Muslims by culture and ethnicity. This means that integration could be possible but assimilation is questionable.


Assumption 185: The reason for Muslim males to kill other sexual roles, and especially other faiths is to degrade them to objects. Precisely because they unconsciously know that all living beings are subjects, they never stop killing them because that's the only way to prove that only Muslim males are subjects.


Assumption 186: The basic dimension of human religion relates open and closed groups:


                                     ALPHA MALE
                         GROUP OF HIGHER MAMMALS

Homininae                                                      Homo erectus

Closed group                                                Open group
Endogamy                                                     Exogamy
Segregation                                                  Assimilation
Genetic monoculture                                  Genetic diversity
Inbreeding                                                     Outbreeding
Male                                                                 Female
(m) subject (f) object                                   (m) subject (f) subject
Sadism                                                           Masochism
SM-dyad                                                         Vanilla-dyad
Guilt allocation                                             Penance
Hatred                                                             Love
Allah                                                                Jesus
Monotheism                                                  Polytheism
Cultural absolutism                                     Cultural relativism
One dimensionality                                     Multidimensionality


Assumption 186: The basic dimension of human religion:

- The more supporters of an ideology, the simpler its doctrine.
- That's why Christianity (2.1 billion) and Islam (1.5) billion have a simple base.
- In addition, Islam and Christianity are also two sides of the same coin.
- They are the extremes of the same dimension.
- In between are all other religions.
- This dimension comes of sexuality.
- And contrasts genetic monoculture with genetic diversity.
- It compares closed groups with open groups.



Assumption 186: Muslims are killing off other faiths not exactly for sexual lust but because of their ideology, by which humanity has to be divided into subjects and objects literally. This originated in the inbreeding and incest culture of first Homininae.


Assumption 187: In Western Europe Muslim-immigration must be stopped immediately and closed groups must be shielded from financial support. If not, then Muslims will overrun Christianity as a matter of time.


Assumption 188: In exogamous cultures man and woman are equivalent; therefore women can be separated easily from their family. But in endogamous cultures women are seen as possessions, hence their fathers decide their fate.


Assumption 189:

Assimilation = f (exogamy). That is [exogamy with exogamy].
Integration = f (endogamy | exogamy). That is [endogamy within exogamy].
Segregation = f (endogamy). That is endogamy within (endogamy or exogamy)]



Assumption 190: The basic dimension of human religion:

Endogamy              Mixed             culture Exogamy.
Segregation           Integration    Assimilation.
Islam                       Judaism         Christianity.


Assumption 191: Another reason to prefer the parallel universe above the earthly universe is that mixed tribal members did not have to reincarnate into other tribes on Earth.


Assumption 192: The greater the number of people worshiping a religion, the easier it must be.



Assumption 193: The primal law of animal religion is the commandment: thou shalt reproduce in genetic diversity.


Assumption 194: Christianity evaluates Islam false because:

1: It wants to mingle with other cultures as exogamy.
2: It maintains a sadomasochistic relation with Islam.
3: It treats an endogamy like exogamy: Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.


Assumption 195: Religion is born in groups of higher mammals and concerns the battle between genetic monoculture and genetic diversity.


Assumption 196: The measure of religion is group permeability.


Assumption 196: The measure of religion is group permeability seen in integration, assimilation and segregation:



Assumption 197: The meaning of religion is finding a balance between genetic monoculture and genetic diversity in groups of higher mammals.


Assumption 198: The alpha male is a polygamous heterosexual and monotheistic God, who attaches to genetic monoculture. In the anti-projection we find 'other sexual roles' (mostly female roles), pursuing genetic diversity.


Assumption 199: The alpha male is a polygamous heterosexual and monotheistic God, who adheres genetic monoculture.




Assumption 200: Human religion in mammalian groups:

1: The primal law of animal religion is propagation in genetic diversity.
2: Human religion is born in groups of higher mammals and concerns the balance between genetic monoculture and genetic diversity.
3: The measure of human religion is group permeability.
4: It comes down to endogamous and exogamous groups.
5: In nature females are the guardians of genetic diversity.
6: In groups, males project a sexual ideal projection into the alpha male.
7: In mammalian groups, males chase genetic monocultures.
8: Hominin groups were roaming through the savannah and fanned out with other groups.
9: Hence, females lost their chance of genetic diversity with unknown males.
10: They were eventually abducted for slavery without any choice for genetic diversity.
11: After millions of years human groups consolidated their genetic monoculture as a religion.
12: Inbreeding and incest became the operating response for the primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality, the lowest abstraction of eternal life.
13: Reincarnation into the (earthly) universe, discovered by Homo erectus about two million years ago, became the secondary reinforcer and was a revolutionary abstraction of eternal life.
14: Ancestors did not die any longer and had to be honored as immanent gods.
15: Reincarnation into animals and beautiful unknown women broke up the sexual monoculture and freed the woman soul.
16: God first creation narrative handles about genetic diversity of Homo erectus. (Enlightenment, Christianity).
17: God second creation story about Adam and Eve is about genetic monoculture by inbreeding and incest. (Hominins, Islam).



Assumption 201: Males in mammal groups tend to be polygamous, leading to genetic monoculture and females often get their offspring from different males tending to genetic diversity.

The alpha male is the strongest male with genes for optimal protection of all females. But basically he is dealing with genetic monoculture in the group of higher mammals, only serving the immediate survival of the group. Because, in the long run the genes of the strongest male will be over-represented in his descendants. And in the long term that would lead to inbreeding.


Assumption 202: ‘Other sexual roles’ define the domain of polytheism, where females defend genetic diversity.


Assumption 203: Sexual deprivation (poverty) strengthens the endogamous group. Promiscuity (wealth) strengthens the exogamous group.



Assumption 204: Forcing a sexually deprived (poor) endogamous group to assimilate within a promiscuous (wealthy) exogamous group means civil war.


Assumption 205: Development of human religion:

1: Homininae were locked up in a sick culture of inbreeding and incest what formed the blueprint for human religion: the first stage of Paradise culture with genetic immortality as first abstraction of eternal life. 
2: Later Homininae and Homo ergaster found the combination of genetic immortality with (earthly) reincarnation called the second stage of Paradise culture.
3: Homo erectus broke up the inbreeding and incest culture, after which women rediscovered their own soul and fulfilled their need for genetic diversity.
4: Homo sapiens discovered the parallel universe which eliminated sexuality from esoteric religion (Christianity). Mixing inbreeding and incest with the parallel universe finally delivered the third stage of Paradise Culture (Islam).


Assumption 206: The permeability of a mammal group concerns the relation between its endogamous heart and the exogamous periphery.


Assumption 206: The permeability of a mammal group concerns the relation between its endogamous heart and the exogamous periphery, which is called ‘religion’ and is determined by the number of equal sexual roles, what is determined by empathy.


Assumption 235: Mammal religion exists by virtue of the balance between endogamy and exogamy, determined by the number of equal sexual roles (Eq.S.R.), which is caused by empathy. Scaling Hominini and Panini on these measures learns bonobos outperform humans on both, while Muslims score the worst.


Assumption 236: The permeability of a culture (exogamy or endogamy) is determined by the degree of empathy with sexual roles.


Assumption 207: In a healthy group, there exists a tension between the endogamous core and the exogamous mantle. If one of them is missing the culture must be sick. Seen in evolutionary perspective, Western culture lacks its endogamous heart and Islamic culture has no exogamous mantle, hence both must be regarded as religious cultures on the verge of extinction.


Assumption 208: Individual animals survive by genetic diversity. But in mammal groups tension arises between the endogamous core (genetic monoculture) of alpha males and compensating exogamous mantles of genetic diversity by females. Without this correction mechanism groups would extinct. Islam will split into an endogamous core (inbreeding and incest) and a religious exogamous shell (without inbreeding). Both, Islam's mantle of religious endogamy (without inbreeding) and Western culture without endogamous core, eventually leave the group stage and return to complete individualism of genetic diversity.


Assumption 209: The endogamous core of a group states how non-members can be seen as objects.


Assumption 210: An ideology is a derivative of the space of gods in the archetype of God. But religion concerns the space of gods itself. Both religion and its derivatives are the endogamous cores of a culture.


Assumption 211: The alpha male is the endogamous heart of the group. His sexual monoculture is based on incest and inbreeding. Females are the exogamous mantle pursuing genetic diversity.


Assumption 212: Islam and Christianity are the endogamous core and exogamous mantle of Homininae groups. Together they form the sadomasochistic dimension, renamed as monotheism in religion. As in a big bang, they drifted apart and in a big crunch, they will destroy each other. By divine judgment of Sexual Scales of Religion sadomasochism will dissolve in murder lust and sexual desire.



Assumption 213: A group of higher mammals exists by virtue of the balance between endogamy and exogamy. Its endogamous core consists of the power of the alpha male to fertilize most females and to establish a genetic monoculture of inbreeding and incest. The exogamic outer layer exists of adulterous females chasing genetic diversity with males from other groups. The total permeability of the group depends on the exact relation between endogamous repulsion and exogamous attraction of external genes. This relation is also called 'human religion'.


Assumption 213:  Group of higher mammals:


A group of higher mammals exists by virtue of the balance between endogamy and exogamy.


Its endogamous core consists of the power of the alpha male to fertilize all females. Hence, he basically establishes a genetic monoculture by inbreeding and incest, only serving the immediate survival of the group. But in the long run his genes will be over-represented in his descendants, unless competitive males in the exogamous mantle contribute to genetic diversity.


But tension also arises between the sexual desires of the dominant male and the females. Since females naturally tend to genetic diversity with other males. Hence, the exogamic outer layer consists of adulterous females chasing genetic diversity with other males and from other groups, what comes down to the permeability of the group.


For humans, the total permeability of the mantle depends on the relation between endogamous repulsion and exogamous attraction of external genes. This relation is the natural base of 'human religion'.



But only on the basis of inbreeding and incest (Islam) permeability is related to endogamy. Endogamous cores in completely permeable cultures as the Enlightenment are derived from other values. 


Assumption 214Freedom of expression is a quality of the exogamous periphery of the group and always indebted to the endogamous divine core. Therefore, there is no absolute freedom of expression other than subject to the prevailing basic morality.


Assumption 215: Pedophilia is the first operationalization of human male religion.


Assumption 216: The prohibition doctrine.
The doctrine argues that monotheistic religions (sexual deprivation) only exist by virtue of what they prohibit (sexual satisfaction). Monotheism only survives and becomes stronger by prohibiting sexual lust. This also means monotheism (male heterosexuality) flourishes by the prohibition of homosexuality (the second god eventually leading to polytheism).


Assumption 217: Perpetual orgasm is the core of human male religion.



Assumption 218: Originally incestuous pedophilia meant sexual relations with daughters and nieces as operationalization of perpetual orgasm of Homininae.



Assumption 219: Nowadays plain pedophilia is but a relic of incestuous
pedophilia of the Homininae. An example is pedophilia in child marriages.




Assumption 220: Perpetual orgasm across generations in this lifetime started as a conscious operant response to elicit the reinforcing stimulus of even more saturated genes in the sexually mature offspring. In this manner, inbreeding promoted tribal identity in the form of genetic immortality. For this reason, first homininae started to fertilize sexually mature daughters and nieces.

This kind of highly saturated inbreeding also led to the insight that sexual intercourse with younger generations in itself contributed to eternal survival. Perpetual orgasm across generations got sacred meaning for eternal fertility of human-like males. This kind of incestuous pedophilia became a human male instinct.

Hence, both inbreeding and incest became human instincts. They developed as compensating instincts because sex with younger generations also was a lustful payment for males for their contribution to the system. Only in inbreeding cultures males are morally rewarded for sex with the own daughters and nieces.

Without compensation of perpetual orgasm with daughters and nieces, inbreeding and incest became unbalanced and caused honor killings much later in the evolution. Perpetual orgasm over generations was the price daughters had to pay for genetic immortality of the tribe.

From the holiness of incestuous pedophilia with daughters and nieces a different kind of pedophilia evolved: sacred pedophilia with sexually immature individuals in general. Of course this was not meant for inbreeding. 

In the evolution incestuous pedophilia lost its former goal to create saturated genes in the offspring because of autosomal recessive disorders and now pedophilia in general was left for perpetual orgasm across generations for males with sexually immature persons.

Hence, nowadays a very insane and sick form of pedophilia with sexually immature persons results from inbreeding, which is not found in the animal world. Later in the evolution, newborns were sacrificed to the gods in holy rituals, so these also could live forever in perpetual orgasm.

Resuming, in the first instance, saturating genes in the offspring contributed to the survival of the genetic identity of the tribe in genetic immortality. In the second instance, perpetual orgasm across generations developed as a human lust for males. And in the third instance, pedophilia developed with sexually immature persons. Meanwhile sacred pedophilia developed and degenerated into sacrifices of newborns to the gods.

Extreme saturated inbreeding has been forbidden already for a very long time because of autosomal recessive disorders, though incestuous pedophilia is still practiced in some parts of the world.

But non-incestuous pedophilia has not been banned. This found its outlet in ordinary pedophilia and child marriages, not found in animals. Child marriages developed as sign of powerful eternal orgasm and expected fertility of the wealthy.

Later in the evolution perpetual orgasm across generations has been sublimated in perpetual orgasm in the offspring after reincarnation into the (earthly) universe and still later in the parallel universe (72 virgins in Heaven, 200.000 ya).




Assumption 221: The Incest Inbreeding Compensation Model (I.I.C.) states if male incest - as contribution to the inbreeding culture - is not compensated by perpetual orgasm across generations, males develop hatred against wives and daughters, whose stoning and honor killings might result.


Assumption 222:

1: Incest with sexually mature girls (daughters and nieces) developed from inbreeding as super saturation of genes in the offspring. Then also incestuous pedophilia with immature daughters and nieces - as perpetual orgasm across generations - developed as reward for males for their contribution to the inbreeding culture. Later in the evolution incest with daughters and nieces was forbidden because of autosomal recessive disorders.

2: Later, the male instinct expanded into non-incestuous pedophilia with sexually immature persons (other people's children). Child marriages developed as sign of powerful perpetual orgasm and expected eternal fertility of the wealthy. It is difficult to feel any empathy for religious instigated pedophilia with sexually immature individuals. In this form it is unknown in the animal world and must have been caused by 7 million years of inbreeding culture. It is a sick aberration of sexuality.

3: Meanwhile sacred pedophilia with sexually immature persons degenerated in the sacrifice of newborns to the gods in holy rituals, so they could live in perpetual orgasm too.



Assumption 143/223: Operant conditioning: Human inbreeding developed as an operant response followed by a reinforcing stimulus of genetic immortality in the (earthly) universe.


Operant response: Inbreeding and incest
Primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality of the tribe in the offspring


Assumption 224: Operant conditioning: Fertilization of daughters and nieces as operant response meant for increased saturation as secondary reinforcing stimulus.


Operant response: Incest
Primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring
Secondary reinforcing stimulus: increased saturation of parental genes



Assumption 225: Operant conditioning: Fertilization of daughters and nieces as operant response meant for perpetual orgasm across generations (mature) as tertiary reinforcing stimulus.


Operant responseIncest 
Primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring
Secondary reinforcing stimulus: increased saturation of parental genes 
Tertiary reinforcing stimulus: perpetual orgasm across generations (mature)



Assumption 226: Operant conditioning: Fertilization of daughters and nieces as operant response meant for perpetual orgasm across generations (immature) as tertiary reinforcing stimulus.


Operant response: Incest 
First reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring
Second reinforcing stimulus: increased saturation of parental genes 
Third reinforcing stimulus: perpetual orgasm across generations (mature)
Fourth reinforcing stimulus: perpetual orgasm across gen. (immature)



Assumption 227: Operant conditioning: Fertilization of daughters and nieces as operant response meant for perpetual orgasm across generations (mature)
forbidden as tertiary reinforcing stimulus.

Operant response: Incest 
First reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring 
Fourth reinforcing stimulus: perpetual orgasm across gen. (immature)



Assumption 228: Operant conditioning: Fertilization of daughters and nieces as operant response meant for perpetual orgasm across generations (mature)
was forbidden as tertiary reinforcing stimulus.

Operant response: Incest
First reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring 
Fourth reinforcing stimulus: perpetual orgasm across gen. (mature)
Fifth reinforcing stimulus: disband sadomasochism into murder lust and sexual desire to compensate for lost perpetual orgasm across generations (mature).



Assumption 229: Grooming.

Pedophiles have paraphilic relationships based on unequal sexual roles. They project their infantile identity into children, degrading themselves as adults. They thereby sublimate unequal sexual roles into apparently equivalent semi-adult friendship. If children do not protest against unfamiliar touching then pedophiles conclude they are taking responsibility and they like it.



Assumption 230: Hard pedophilia is perpetual orgasm across generations.


Assumption 231: Soft pedophilia (grooming) is displaced perpetual orgasm across generations.


Assumption 232 (short): Pedophilia started with the raping of sexually mature daughters for genetic saturation of parental genes in the inbreeding culture. Because of autosomal recessive disorders, mature daughters have been replaced with sexually immature daughters later in the evolution. This is called displacement of perpetual orgasm across generations, what was the reward for males for their contribution to the inbreeding culture.

As a consequence of this hereditary displacement hard pedophilia (rape) nowadays concerns lust in sexually immature girls and boys. It is an unnatural human sexual drive evolved out of inbreeding which is only viable in sadomasochistic cultures.

As a 'logical' result of immature raping, daughters were sold for child marriage just before sexual maturity. Both, displacement (pedophilia with sexually immature daughters) and sublimation (perpetual orgasm in Heaven) have settled in the human mind as genetically transferable forms of perpetual orgasm.

Soft pedophilia (without rape, grooming) is based on the Vanilla-dyad, which in the Western world is based on equal sexual roles and equivalent relations. Hence, soft pedophiles displace rape for impermissible sexual acts, and sublimate unequal sexual roles into apparently equivalent semi-adult friendship.

If children do not protest against unfamiliar touching then pedophiles conclude they are taking responsibility and they like it.



Assumption 232 (extended): Pedophilia started with the raping of sexually mature
daughters for genetic saturation of parental genes in the inbreeding culture.
Meanwhile perpetual orgasm across generations developed as a pleasure and as reward for inbreeding. Both, inbreeding (tribal genetic immortality) and incest (perpetual orgasm for individual males) are compensating mechanisms for attaining eternal life.


The precise interaction between perpetual orgasm (incest) and the saturation of genes (inbreeding) is unknown yet. Raping of sexually mature daughters (incest) might have been justified by genetic saturation (inbreeding). But in the third instance, mating over generations signified an extreme libido, causing perpetual orgasm developed as the core of human male religion.

Because of autosomal recessive disorders, mature daughters have been replaced with sexually immature daughters later in the evolution. This is called displacement of perpetual orgasm across generations. Hard pedophilia (rape) with sexually
immature girls is the first displacement (or substitution) in hominin culture.


As a consequence of this hereditary displacement of sexual lust, hard pedophilia (rape) concerns nowadays lust in sexually immature girls and boys. It is an unnatural human sexual drive evolved out of inbreeding which is only viable within sadomasochistic cultures.

As a 'logical' result of immature raping, daughters were sold for child marriage just before sexual maturity. In this way hard pedophilia (rape) became the evolutionary end-stage of inbreeding cultures based on the SM-dyad (unequal sexual roles). This is better known as child marriages in Islamic culture and others.
Unlike pedophilia, homosexuality is a well-known phenomenon in the animal world which did not arise from hominin culture. But homosexuality combined with pedophilia (Christian Church) indeed comes from perpetual orgasm across generations. Hence perpetual orgasm does not discriminate on sexual orientation.

Later in the evolution, perpetual orgasm for a lot of other reasons sublimated
into perpetual orgasm in the parallel universe. Both, displacement (pedophilia with sexually immature daughters) and sublimation (perpetual orgasm in Heaven) settled in the human mind as genetically transferable forms of perpetual orgasm. In human evolution religious delusions interacted with sexuality and formed new instincts which are completely unknown in the animal world.

Soft pedophilia (without rape; grooming) is based on the Vanilla-dyad, which in the Western world is based on equal sexual roles and equivalent relations. Hence, soft pedophiles were forced to displace rape for impermissible sexual acts, and to sublimate unequal sexual roles into apparently equivalent semi-adult friendship.
For this purpose pedophiles project their infantile identity into children, degrading themselves as adults. They thereby sublimate unequal sexual roles into apparently equivalent semi-adult friendship. If children do not protest against unfamiliar touching then pedophiles conclude they are taking responsibility and they like it.

It is not really empathy what pedophiles are feeling; on the contrary it is a narcissistic disorder, a fake relationship with a non-existing entity, a sick self-projection into an innocent child. It is an escape from adulthood and sublimation and displacement of temporary orgasm within generations.



Assumption 233Perpetual orgasm across generations is a form of pedophilia born out of inbreeding. It first served genetic saturation of the tribe (genetic immortality), in which sexually mature daughters were fertilized by their fathers. In the second instance, this orgasmic lust developed as a reward for inbreeding. In the third instance, mating over generations signified extreme libido, causing perpetual orgasm to develop as the core of human male religion. 

Later, perpetual orgasm developed as incestuous pedophilia with sexually immature daughters to avoid autosomal recessive disorders.

Perpetual orgasm across generations is projected in this lifetime and after death. In this lifetime it means raping and fertilizing very young persons. After death it means ancestors mating with distant descendants after reincarnation. And in the ultimate case very old men want to mate with countless virgins in the parallel universe.



Assumption 234: Selective breeding with Homininae.

Human family (Hominini) has about the same genome as chimpanzees (Panini). Both evolved as Homininae, from 7 to 4 million years ago. Because Homininae set the first steps towards human religion, chimpanzees are our natural control group.

And then it turns into the evolution, humans and chimpanzees developed the same remarkable split in religion. For the family of chimpanzees (Panini), this became clear with the split into common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus). About a similar division split Humans into Muslims and Christians. The behavior of Muslims is somewhat similar to that of common chimpanzees, while bonobos are more like Christians.

The split in Hominini is caused by the harsh environment of the desert (Paradise culture) versus the opulence of heavenly temperate regions (Christianity). And the split in Panini is caused by a shortage of food (common chimpanzee), against an abundant food supply for bonobos south of the Congo River.

Common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and Muslims (Islam) developed behavior definitely characterized by unequal sexual roles. Bonobos (Pan paniscus) and Christians, however, developed behavior with equivalent sexual relations:

Assumption 203: Sexual deprivation (poverty) strengthens the endogamous group. Promiscuity (wealth) strengthens the exogamous group.
Assumption 240: Polygamy leads to inbreeding in patriarchies (Islam) and to outbreeding in matriarchies (bonobos and elephants).

Moreover, in the evolution chimpanzees practiced selected breeding on their population by killing males, who sought for genetic diversity in other tribes. Only sadistic males survived defending genetic monoculture, though adolescent females were free to wander between tribes looking for genetic diversity.

In the evolution a worse development of selective breeding in Paradise culture (former Islam) culled all human characters not suited for inbreeding and incest, males and females. There, a population evolved with an excess of sadistic males and masochistic females.

Hence it is questionable if common chimpanzees and bonobos ever will assimilate. The same question arises with Muslims and Christians.

Assumption 204: Forcing a sexually deprived (poor) endogamous group to assimilate within a promiscuous (wealthy) exogamous group means civil war.

Assumption 235: Mammal religion exists by virtue of the balance between endogamy and exogamy, determined by the number of equal sexual roles (Eq.S.R.), caused by empathy. Scaling Hominini and Panini on these measures learns bonobos outperform humans on both, while Muslims score the worst.


Assumption 236: The permeability of a culture (exogamy or endogamy) is determined by the degree of empathy with sexual roles.


Assumption 206: The permeability of a mammal group concerns the relation between its endogamous heart and the exogamous periphery, which is called ‘religion’ and is determined by the number of equal sexual roles, what is determined by empathy.


Assumption 237: Enlightenment and anti-Enlightenment(DIT IS ONZIN)
Sometimes things are much easier to understand by adding simple auxiliary functions. For example, we can conceive the Enlightenment symbolically as a dichotomous (0.1) vector from the origin. Then, Western culture scores 1 and Islam scores 0 on Enlightenment. But we also add the anti-Enlightenment vector on which Islam scores 1. Ostensibly an identical dimension, but with a different position in space, because 'man' and 'woman' also are not each other's opposite. (DIT IS ONZIN)

And of course, both vectors can be projected on a third dimension with one degree of freedom, on which they occupy the poles: exogamy (Christianity) versus endogamy (Islam).

By further processing all human cultures can be placed somewhere on this interval scaled dimension. Then, the scale eventually predicts Islam will segregate in most cultures. Christianity almost always assimilates, and Judaism will integrate. Now it happens, only by adding this extra dimension we sufficiently describe, explain and predict Homininae religion.



Assumption 238: In the animal world of the hominids sexual roles were decisive. In the human world of hominins sexual roles were gods. And in modern society gods are cultural dimensions.


Assumption 239: Christianity, Enlightenment, Romanticism 

Christianity.

Christianity emphatically recognized 'other sexual roles' and essentially is a doctrine obsessed with guilt and self-abasement, cultivating a masochistic slave mentality. A distinction should be made between the endogamic sadistic church and the exogamic masochistic teachings of Jesus. 

Enlightenment.

Enlightenment chose rationality above magical thinking of religion. It can be characterized as democracy, equality of race and gender, complete freedom of thought and expression and the separation of church and state. From Enlightenment comes: ‘liberty, equality and fraternity’. In particular, reason would produce universal principles to which the equivalence of races and cultures could be assessed. Also was supposed universal moral truth is known. But more tragically Enlightenment was not able to formulate and enforce widely accepted standards.


Romanticism.

Romanticism is a reaction on Enlightenment, choosing subjective feelings above reason. In their view race, culture and moral values cannot be measured on a universal scale. Hence, equality between cultures was adopted without scientific standards, by which no superior race, culture or set of moral values exists. The cultural revolution of the sixties was in fact a romantic revolution and former Christians like Policor twisted the teachings of Jesus into masochism.



The curse of Enlightenment is its inability to formulate widely accepted universal standards to distinguish between races, cultures and morality. In response, Romanticism claimed equivalence in all areas.



Assumption 240: The development of racism.

1: In the animal world groups accept only members of the same kind so they can propagate. Hence, a group of gorillas will not accept a female chimp. This is discrimination between species. Later in the evolution, another form of discrimination emerged, but now as discrimination within species, called racism.


2: Though all kinds of Homininae (7 mya; 400 cc) possibly were of the same species, they already started to select their own kind, their own race. Their group identity drifted away from pure physical propagation into the religious propagation of tribal identity (religion). So they were not interested in pure propagation with other Homininae races any longer, but more in maintaining feelings of tribal identity. And the only way to control for tribal belongingness was race, not culture. So Homininae already selected on external racial characteristics.

3: Much later racism must have been strengthened further through reincarnation into the tribe (Homo erectus; 2 mya, 900 cc). For, only by pure inbred bodies of descendants, ancestors could reincarnate into the tribe. Concluding, real racism started with the Homininae (400 cc; 7 mya) and was strenghtened by Homo erectus (900 cc; 2 mya).

4: Homo sapiens (1400 cc; 200.000 ya) developed bigger tribes and bigger cultures. Still tribal belongingness (religion) was seen from the racial appearance of foreigners. The same with the period of ethnic endogamy. Only later in religious endogamy, factual religion (Islam, Christianity) really became more important than race. For example, today the religious endogamic outer layer of Islam is not filled with Arabs any longer but with a billion people of other races. Yet we judge Islam as a completely racist culture because it distinguishes between human beings like the Nazis: It oppresses 'other sexual roles'.

5: Concluding: in the evolution preserving genes of groups has been changed to preserving religion within human tribes.

6: But because selective breeding cultures like Islam imply strong interactions between ethnicity and culture, racial appearance still effectively triggers cultural (religious) discrimination. Therefore, also in the modern world racism continues to be a simple and effective mechanism to distinguish between persons from different cultures. Obviously, this results in many errors of judgment.



Assumption 242: Polygamy leads to inbreeding in patriarchies (Islam and to outbreeding in matriarchies (bonobos and elephants).



Assumption 241: Factors of pedophilia

There is a connection between power and pedophilia and therefore this happens mainly in "the highest levels" of church and politics. How it works:

1: The instinctive protection of children by their parents is the strongest emotion in child abuse (genetic diversity, exogamy).

2: But in inbreeding cultures, a much larger role plays the possible infringement of the virginity of daughters for inbreeding purposes or child marriages (genetic monoculture, endogamy).

3: In more civilized cultures two kinds of empathy developed. In polytheism and nowadays Western 'grooming', projection into children of the own sexual lust assumes they will appreciate sexual contact, whereas on the other hand real empathy concludes children are unable to safeguard their natural rights and must stay untouched (later Western culture) .

4: Actually, real pedophilia concerns sexual interest in children without matured secondary sex characteristics. Men attracted to already quite mature girls aged 13 are no pedophiles. This is called ephebophilia.

5: Because of the interpretation of natural rights of children a reasonable age limit of 16 years has been set. Between 13 and 16 years usually child abuse cannot be called 'pedophilia'.

6. The main difference with the animal world is human interest in children just because of immature sex characteristics.

7: If religion is a form of sexuality, then pedophilia is a form of religion in which the deranged desire for 'perpetual orgasm across generations' finds its greatest fulfillment in not yet burgeoned sexuality.


Efebofilie is de seksuele voorkeur van een volwassene voor pubers. Ongeveer vanaf twaalf jaar houdt de psychiatrische grens van pedofilie op en begint efebofilie. De seksuele voorkeur voor rijpende meisjes wordt ook wel parthenofilie genoemd. Voorwaarde is dat de oudere persoon met deze voorkeur zelf duidelijk de adolescentie ontstegen is; hij of zij moet ten minste midden twintig zijn. Efebofilie is evenals pedofilie een parafilie; of het ook een psychische aandoening betreft staat niet geheel vast.



Assumption 241: Factors of pedophilia

Er is een verbinding tussen macht en pedofilie en daarom vindt dit ook vooral plaats in 'de hoogste kringen' van kerk en politiek. Hoe zit het in elkaar:

1: De instinctieve bescherming van kinderen door de ouders is de sterkste emotie bij kindermisbruik (genetische diversiteit, exogamy).

2: Maar bij inteeltculturen speelt de mogelijke schending van de maagdelijkheid van de dochter voor inteelt of uithuwelijking een veel grotere rol (genetische monocultuur, endogamie).

3: Bij de mens ontwikkelden zich in de evolutie twee soorten van empathie in de meer beschaafde culturen. Daarbij onderscheidt men 'projectie' waarin men kan menen dat het kind de seksuele omgang waardeert (polytheïsme, 'grooming'), dan wel waarlijke empathie waaruit men terecht concludeert dat een kind niet in staat is zijn of haar natuurrechten op verantwoorde wijze te borgen (de latere Westerse cultuur).

4: Pedofilie betreft eigenlijk alleen de seksuele belangstelling voor personen zonder volgroeide secondaire geslachtskenmerken. Mannen die zich aangetrokken voelen tot reeds behoorlijk volgroeide meisjes van 13 jaar zijn daarom geen pedofiel.

5: Vanwege de verantwoorde invulling van de natuurrechten van kinderen is een redelijke leeftijdsgrens gesteld van 16 jaar. Tussen 13 en 16 jaar is kindermisbruik in de regel geen pedofilie meer te noemen.

6. Het belangrijkste verschil met de dierenwereld is de mannelijke interesse in kleine kinderen juist vanwege onvolgroeide seksuele geslachtskenmerken. En daar wringt ook de schoen:

7: Als religie een vorm van seksualiteit is dan is pedofilie een vorm van religie, waarin de gestoorde zucht naar 'eeuwig durend orgasme over generaties' juist in de nog niet ontloken seksualiteit haar grootste bevrediging vindt.

@Mark_D_NL | 04-08-15 | 21:40

Bij sex tussen volwassenen en minderjarigen zijn twee voorwaarden: onafhankelijkheid èn beslissingsbekwaamheid.

Pedofilie is een ongewenste/onnatuurlijke (kies maar een pejoratief die je past) voorkeur van volwassenen voor pre-puberale kinderen. Die laatste hebben geen onafhankelijkheid en geen beslissingsbekwaamheid.

Kindermisbruikers hebben maling aan beide voorwaarden en handelen alleen naar hun eigen driften en dienen derhalve aan de hoogste boom gehangen te worden.

Basic Dimension veronderstelt die voorwaarde van beslissingsbekwaamheid dan ook met "dan wel waarlijke empathie waaruit men terecht concludeert dat een kind niet in staat is zijn of haar natuurrechten op verantwoorde wijze te borgen".

Vanaf een jaar of twaalf, zodra de puberteit inzet, wordt het efebofilie genoemd. Dit is een grijs gebied

Mooi. Nu dit opgehelderd is kan het heksenverbranden weer verdergaan.
BenBinnen | 04-08-15 | 22:21


Assumption 242: Polygamy leads to inbreeding in patriarchies (Islam and to outbreeding in matriarchies (bonobos and elephants).


Assumption 243: The cause of Chrislam:

On the sexual dimension Christianity always is a weaker religion than Islam, because the homosexual clergy of Christianity is only the second God of the animal world, arrogantly representing itself as deputy of the first on earth. As we know the first God is the masculine and polygamous heterosexual Alpha male who was left behind in the animal world. Of course Muslim males will reject homosexuality as their God. They still worship inbreeding and incest of the Alpha male and that's why Islam will always win from Christianity. Moreover, Christianity is nothing more than the masochistic counterpart of sadistic Islam. Hence, on the instinctive dimension, the SM-dyad will always defeat Vanilla-dyad. That's because the latter is only prosthesis for the real sexual instinct. Therefore we see the murder of Marxist nihilism on the homosexual clergy of Christianity automatically created a vacuum for the heterosexual God of Islam. Marxism nihilism accidentally created Chrislam.


Assumption 244
: The fatal flaw in endogamous cultures is their inability to reject older concepts of eternal life. As a result concepts are confounded and heavily compromised in the interactions which give horrible and schizophrenic results.


Assumption 245: All misunderstandings within Islamic culture, all the atrocities, killings and looting, rapes, stoning and acid attacks are the result of schizophrenic interactions among competing concepts of eternal life that never should have been mixed.



Assumption 246: In the exogamous mantle (sexuality) of Christianity, women project themselves in Jesus as personification of 'other sexual roles', which includes male homosexuality as a second God. But in nature, women have an anti-projection on the endogamous core (religion), on the first sexual God, well known as male heterosexuality. That follows SM-dyad. But in current sick religion of Christianity homosexuality plays a major role, both in the endogamous core (homosexual clergy) as in the exogamous mantle (Jesus), making Christianity fall under Vanilla-dyad. But the latter is only prosthesis on the sexual instinct and women have no instinctive relation with male homosexuality. Which means in evolution Christianity will return to SM-dyad, to Chrislam and women's emancipation will drag sadistic Allah into Europe.



Assumption 247: Later humans projected God in the parallel universe as an immortal personification of Homo sapiens. A mortal God would not be worshiped.


Assumption 248: Endogamous cultures practice inbreeding and incest as an instinct since Homininae. First inbreeding was tied to genetic immortality, but later to earthly reincarnation, which combination is currently in force: the expectation of earthly reincarnation of tribal males reinforces inbreeding and incest.


Assumption 248
: Most compelling difference between earthly and heavenly reincarnation is the first is finite, since dependent on tribal survival, while the latter is infinite and achieves eternal life without any restriction



Assumption 249: Wherever Western culture was introduced by imperialism or colonialism it created anti-racism and drowned the world in an orgy of murder and manslaughter. The odd thing is promiscuous Western culture often sees 'racism' as the cause while 'anti-racism' clearly is the culprit: 
Racism = separation of tribal inbreeding cultures = peace and harmony.


Anti-racism = mixing of tribal inbreeding cultures = murder and manslaughter


Assumption 250Perpetual orgasm across generations. 

Within this lifetime extreme virility is projected as the largest imaginable sexual distance between sexes. For example: between older and somewhat impotent men and sexually immature girls (child marriage). 



Assumption 251: Cultural orgasm is sexual satisfaction based on alleged sexual interest of other cultures.



New categorization human religion:

Assumption 252:

Timeline is not important, only brainsize matters:

1: 
Genetic immortality into descendants by inbreeding and incest (Homininae, 7-4 mya; 400 cc). 

With genetic immortality the genetic mirror of parents was found back in their offspring, though they themselves died or slept forever. Physical remains of Homininae were not gathered but were eaten by scavengers, hence they could not contribute to eternal tribal identity by rebirth.

Therefore, in this period of roaming through the savannas of Africa, first Homininae learned to bury their dead to prevent scavengers. However, the buried and forever sleeping deceased still were sacrificed to premature decay by worms and insects in the soil. Hence, their physical remains, which were not gathered, could not contribute to eternal tribal identity.


2: Tribal immortality by cave burials
(Australopithecus, 4.3-3 mya; 400 cc)

In addition to genetic immortality deceased tribal members were gathered in caves for eternal tribal identity.

After settling down near caves for longer time Australopiths discovered revolutionary new ways to prevent premature decay of dead bodies. Caves were a tremendous improvement above normal burying. Now, they all would stay together after death. Hence, in addition to genetic immortality, tribal immortality by cave burials was an enormous strengthening of eternal group identity.

3. Rebirth in caves without splitting body and soul.

(Australopithecus, 3-2 mya; 450 cc).
(Homo naledi, 1.97 mya; 500 cc): possibly a hybrid between (Australopithecus, 4.3-2 mya; 400 cc) and (Homo erectus, 2 mya; 900 cc).

As said, in addition to genetic immortality deceased tribal members were gathered in caves for eternal tribal identity.

Homo naledi wanted to prevent decay of bodies by worms and insects in the soil. Perhaps, he found the first noticed primitive way of mummifying the sleeping deceased (who remained in their bodies) in the refrigerator of the Rising Star Cave. Then it would not be reincarnation, but only tribal immortality of gathered bones in addition to genetic immortality into descendants for eternal tribal identity.

But think about it. Then there was no reason to throw them into the chute since there were plenty other and easier caves without all this trouble. No, we miss something in this scenario.

- We also know the underworld in Greek mythology. Homo naledi knew a lot from caves and possibly got the idea a complete underworld existed in the underground connected by all caves he knew. He also knew all life finally started from the soil. So, he knew it was the underworld which was life giving

Homo naledi possibly assumed the giant Rising Star Cave somehow was the holy entrance to new life far beneath the surface of the earth. And the harrowing shark-mouth chute, the 12 meter deep funnel to Dinaledi chamber was the actual access to that world. This was the big mouth to the underworld and so they threw their deceased right into their next life. Just like Hindus throw their dead into the Ganges. It was the first form of rebirth without splitting body and soul.

Rebirth is possible only if dead bodies are relatively unharmed and after rebirth there must be no remains found. That happened with the body of Jesus and with the bodies of Dinaledi chamber. Homo naledi didn't expect bodies to stay there forever. He was so sure of his belief that he didn't even bother to inspect Dinaledi chamber, maybe this was just considered sacrilege. The Rising Star Cave might be the only very special case to study rebirth of Australopiths.


4: Reincarnation into the (earthly) universe (Homo erectus, 2 mya; 900 cc).
After humanlike creatures split body and soul they invented reincarnation into other bodies. And now individuals lived forever.

In case of reincarnation caves are not needed:

1: Because damaged dead bodies are allowed.
2: Because the bones of the deceased may stay visible while they reincarnate elsewhere.
3: But for reincarnation the auxiliary hypothesis is needed of separation of body and soul.
4: Because the invisible Dinalidi chamber is a extremely special case, later Homo erectus was forced to invent the separation of body and soul for reincarnation.

But now for reincarnation may methods diverge. Does the soul find a way out to the stars as in the Pyramids? And could the soul of deceased Homo erectus escape through the Superman's Crawl and the harrowing shark-mouth chute? Of course it could. 

The Rising Star Cave marks a new era in which tribes were not roaming all the time and learned burying their dead into cavesFrom now on if possible they would migrate from cave to cave to give their deceased a better burial. But remember, for the soul it is not easy to leave a mummified body. With normal decay it would leave the body much easier.



5: Reincarnation into the parallel universe (Homo sapiens, 0.2 mya; 1450 cc)
At this point humans faced a dilemma. On the one hand techniques for mummification improved which kept the bodies intact, but on the other hand the soul much easier escapes from a decomposing body. But a lot of human cultures opted for a combination of mummification and reincarnation.



Homo naledi

Homo naledi tells us we must reconsider human religion completely from animal religion where natural concepts about death and the afterlife (sleeping forever) already evolved. This means all options are open and even if Homo naledi did not distinguish between body and soul his life was not finished after death. His life went on in the underworld and he became a young Homo naledi in the rebound, a rebirth in his own body. The very fact that primitive people think from the perspective of animals makes rebirth of Homo naledi in the Rising Star Cave possible.





Resuming:

Degree of development of human religion:

Assumption 252:

Timeline is not important, only brainsize matters:

1: 
Genetic immortality into descendants by inbreeding and incest. 
(Homininae, 7-4 mya; 400 cc). 

2: Tribal immortality by cave burials(Australopithecus, 4.3-3 mya; 400 cc)

3. Rebirth in caves without splitting body and soul.

(Australopithecus, 3-2 mya; 450 cc).
(Homo naledi, 1.97 mya; 500 cc): possibly a hybrid between (Australopithecus, 4.3-2 mya; 400 cc) and (Homo erectus, 2 mya; 900 cc).

4: Reincarnation into the (earthly) universe (Homo erectus, 2 mya; 900 cc).

5: Reincarnation into the parallel universe (Homo sapiens, 0.2 mya; 1450 cc)


Assumption 253: What is religion?

Tribal groups of Homininae (7 mya; 400 cc), roaming through the savanna caused displacement on the cultural dimension (position), changing sexual habits. Religion can be seen as developed from a set of higher order time derivatives of changing sexual culture (position).


Time derivatives of changing sexual position lead to 'religion'. The first derivative gives sexual velocity. The second - which is an elaboration of religion - is called 'acceleration' and gives change of sexual velocity in speed and/or direction. 


On the basis of 'religion' groups decide to strenghten or slow down the change in sexual culture. Hence, 'religion' is as the speed control of cars by the police.


Religion becomes the timelessness derivative of sexuality when the last higher order time derivative is zero. Cultures desperately try to find this last derivative, which leads to perpetual orgasm in eternal life.


Assumption 254: In the animal world a perfectly balanced sexual culture does not need any steering by religion. In other words: SEXUAL CULTURE = RELIGION.




Assumption 255: The future of Islam.

Islam can be described in three concentric circles.

- The inner circle consists of tribal endogamy and is formed by Arab Muslims who still have heavy inbreeding and incest. The optimum ratio in the Muslim population is 40 % tribal based inbreeding, against 60 % ethnically based outbreeding and is considered the holy grail of God, the wisdom taken from the tree of knowledge.

- The middle group consists of ethnic endogamy and is a transition group of Arab Muslims, in which inbreeding and incest is diluting from tribal endogamy to the outer group of religious endogamy. Here, the holy grail of inbreeding and incest reigns still strong.

- The outer circle is formed by an ethnic diverse group of Muslims which is connected mainly by religious endogamy. Inbreeding and incest is diluted more and more but Muslim females are still forced to marry Muslims. So, leaving the outer mantle of Islam is forbidden and females are still killed on marrying non-Muslims:


- Inbreeding and incest is actually diluted in the religious outer mantle of Islamic culture by outbreeding within the greater Muslim domain. But this does not mean the inbreeding instinct itself has gone. This instinct disappears only by outbreeding with non-Muslims. By mingling with exogamous peoples without inbreeding instinct.

Only when Muslims mingle with non-Muslims for a vast number of generations this horrible inbreeding instinct might disappear. But until the very present day Muslim girls are murdered in the religious outer mantle if yearning to genetic diversity with non-Muslims.

The tribal core of inbreeding and incest will only survive in a rigid and frozen society in which women and girls can be checked on a daily basis. Within today's high tech and flexible society, the Islamic core of inbreeding and incest will extinct. But that does not apply to the inbreeding and incest instinct of Arab Muslims. They very likely will regress to former Paradise culture without any rules (Sharia) or consultation (mosques) of society. In Paradise culture every tribal head (Muslim male) will be his own God again: pure criminality.

The outer mantle of religious endogamy will feel the attack on its one-dimensional monotheism by porn on the internet. The reign of the Almighty Allah will be over and besides heterosexuality a second God comes on the scene: homosexuality.

Only a two dimensional society has the ability to split mosque and state. The separation of powers and the separation of church and state is dependent on the number of degrees of freedom in a sexual culture. This number depends on the number of free sexual roles, e.g. the number of gods: God and Jesus. Hence porn on the internet = polytheism.


Taking all, Islamic culture will collapse by the loss of inbreeding and incest. The old Arabic core will degenerate into pure criminality. The outer mantle of religious endogamy will explode as a red giant and will mingle with the rest of the world, freeing Muslim females.

After many generations, in which the inbreeding and incest instinct will be diluted by mingling with exogamous peoples, a new religion will be born called: Chrislam. It will have the exogamous mantle of Christianity but a new core of sort of Islam. There will be nothing new in the world.




Assumption 256: Human religion is developed from a set of higher order time derivatives and controls sexual culture by ethical norms and values. Therefore it looks like religion comes from God. But religion is an eternal life ideology. The last time-derivative will be zero and has been always wanted diligently, for it is expected to lead the sexual culture to the eternal existence in another universe. It is the timelessness derivative of sexuality: perpetual orgasm in the parallel universe.


Assumption 256: Human religion is developed from the first order time derivative of sexual culture and sets the rules for steering sexuality by ethical norms and values. Therefore it looks like religion comes from God. There are rational and irrational (magical) religious measures on sexual culture. Humans try to find that measure which leads sexual culture to the eternal existence in another universe. They are trying to find the 'timelessness derivative' of sexuality: perpetual orgasm in the parallel universe.


Assumption 257: Remember, big apes (Hominids: 20 mya; 350cc) matured earlier than humans at about 8 years. The same for Homininae (7 mya; 400cc), including Australopiths and Homo Naledi. Also for nowadays chimps and bonobos (400cc). Even Turkana boy 1.6 mya (Homo ergaster 1.9 mya; 900 cc) had about adult size at 8 years (152-179 cm). But Homo sapiens got too big brains and matures at about 13 years.




Assumption 258: Policor defined.

A world wide caesura exists between policor and non-policor. Therefore, any analysis of policor must have universal coverage and must be valid for Christianity in the Western world as for Buddhism in Asia. Concerning policor former Christianity is opposed to Islam in Western Europe while the same happens with Buddhism in Asia.


What is the fundamental difference between Christianity and Islam? In the last century Christianity definitely switched to Vanilla-dyad while Islam kept SM-dyad. For example, in 1991 rape was abolished within marriage in the Netherlands. And forced tongue kissing and such innocuous was sentenced to prison for rape.


This arrogance of Western culture is shocking. Proud as they were with the Enlightenment, they denied SM-dyad as the corner stone of human sexual nature. 

In a radical change of direction feminists exchanged SM-dyad for Vanilla-dyad upon which Western culture went into a free fall. It is the fall of the Enlightenment which has been unable to formulate strict rules for the comparison of cultures. The Enlightenment gave way to the irresponsible Romanticism, to Marxism but also to insane feminism.


What is the fundamental difference between policor and non-policor in relation to Islam? In the Western world, policor women unconsciously became disappointed and unsatisfied with Vanilla-dyad and subsequently wanted to merge with Islam to return into SM-dyad, called Chrislam. Since it is just women in the top of society who advocate the Muslim immigration beyond all borders. 

We must conclude there are only irrational and unconscious grounds for the influx of millions of Muslims in the Western world since rational grounds are falsified. It is much more complicated but in the end sexuality is the only passion to explain the Muslim immigration.


Understanding the relation between Islam and Christianity is a discourse on sexuality. Within sexuality, Islam and Christianity maintain a sadomasochistic relationship which is a sexual aberration from Judaism. Sadism and masochism need each other and it is clear both religions will ever collapse in a vortex of murder and manslaughter. SM-dyad will haunt mankind to the farthest stars.


We might not like this sexual model at all. But remember, the only thing that matters is to explain the Muslim immigration and to make reliable predictions about the future. Until now there has not been formulated a better model.


                                             ----------------------------------


Most of policor in Western Europe was raised in Christian indoctrination. They are the remnants of a dying religion, which lost its endogamous core in the last part of the twentieth centuryThat's why former Christians desperately seek for Islam as the replacing core of norms and values. However their search is a unconscious process.


Islam and Christianity must be seen as sexual aberrations of Judaism, from which they form the sadistic and masochistic counterpart. Notice, only monotheism unfolds the sadomasochistic dimension. Although it seems otherwise, in Western Europe both religions are on the verge of extinction and need each other for survival. They are each others second point in space to give direction and meaning to sadism and masochism. Muslims come in Heaven by killing unbelievers and Christians being killed by unbelievers.


Here again we see the almost perfect parallel between sexuality (sadomasochism) and religion (monotheism) which are two sides of the same coin. According to the Sexual Theory of Religion, sadomasochism and monotheism form about an identity in which monotheism controls sexual culture by means of sadomasochism *). 


The viability of Christianity is guaranteed by the strength of its sadistic counterpart and nowadays Islam fulfills this hidden component.

Desperate former Christians, called 'policor', adore Islam because they unconsciously feel their religion will otherwise expire. And 2000 years of Christianity cannot be wiped out with a pen stroke:


Matthew 5:44

King James Bible Jesus:

But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;


Islam and Christianity are in a deadly embrace in Western Europe. Policor secretly glorifies Muslim atrocities as the evil sent by God as punishment for sin and as fuel for their masochistic lusts. After first inventing 'sin' and 'penance', the ultimate fulfilling of their masochistic needs will be found in being slaughtered by Islamic unbelievers from which perfect predictions to Chrislam can be made.

But remember, this prediction only applies to policor. Meanwhile new generations are grown up, not indoctrinated with masochistic Christianity. They will reject Chrislam and start a civil war on life and death against Islamic culture.

*) The main organizing factor in the rank = 5 space of human sexuality is sadomasochism. All imaginable sexual roles are dependent combinations of these 5 independent dimensions.


-  Also, the principal component of the polytheistic space is the accumulation of power on the monotheistic dimension. Thousands of gods are dependent combinations of the first 5 independent dimensions.

- Then, under the assumption gods are sexual roles both spaces form a 5 dimensional identity in which monotheism about equals sadomasochism and religion is a form of sexuality.

- But within sexuality religion has a special function. Religion is a set of higher order time derivatives which controls sexual culture. These time derivatives mirror human religious evolution and are inflated by magical thinking. But to be clear, in this case monotheism controls sexual culture by force of sadomasochism.


- Now we understand how 'religion' works: monotheism normally means all power in the hands of heterosexual males (sadism) who see themselves as subjects and terrorize 'other sexual roles' as objects (masochism) to behave as slaves with prescribed sexual behavior.



Assumption 259: Human religion.

Sexual culture Y=f(t) is a function of time t. And religion controls sexual culture by a set of higher order time derivatives, from which it gets the information how to alter sexual culture.


This may look somewhat difficult but is very simple to understand. Think about the police (X=t) controlling the speed of cars (Y=f(t)). If cars drive too slow or too fast the police will interfere.


Now, instead of the curve of the speed of cars we take the curve of inbreeding and incest which results from the first humanlike culture [homininae (7 mya; 400cc)]. Then, we see the effects of inbreeding and incest as effects of sexual culture over time.


We know group identity is the aim of every religion. For inbreeding cultures this means tribal self-identity is promoted by inbreeding. So, at a rising curve tribal self-identity is promoted by more look-a-likes in the offspring and with a decreasing curve genetic group identity diminishes. Controlling this process of sexual culture over time is called 'religion'. 


We are sure the first humanlike religion was 'genetic immortality by inbreeding and incest'. Speech or symbolic thinking was not essential. It is exactly the same religion of Islamic culture. It is simply copying the genetic code of the tribe into the offspring as secure as possible. But this increase finds its limits in too many hereditary diseases such as autosomal recessive diseases. That's why 'religion' orders to capture new women slaves from time to time. But it is more complicated. 



SPACE AND TIME EFFECTING SEXUAL CULTURE


Sexual culture is influenced more by displacement in space than in time. Sexual culture of the hominoidae (20-15 mya; 300cc) did not alter in time since they always lived in the forests in the same place and on short interbreeding distances of other groups. 


In contrast the first humanlike cultures [homininae (7 mya; 400cc] left the trees in little groups and roamed through the savannas bipedally. Definitely their sexual culture changed into inbreeding and incest because these small and slow groups fell apart in Africa. 


From the forests they took with them the habit to exchange juvenile females with other groups (chimps and bonobos). This is the well known hunters-gatherers effect found back also in Neanderthals: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ki3rWqtAf8o

(40:41/1:22:30).

But on the other hand they enhanced tribal identity beyond the male mitochondrial DNA by closing the exogamous mantle for women as in today's Islam.



GENETIC IMMORTALITY IN THE OFFSPRING


We are sure the first humanlike religion was 'genetic immortality in the offspring by inbreeding and incest'. This religion resulted in nowadays Islamic culture. The basic principle is simply to copy the genetic code of the tribe into the offspring as secure as possible. 


But a lot of things have changed meanwhile. Effects are confounded in the evolution, since pure tribal endogamy does not exist any longer. Even ethnic endogamy has been outpaced meanwhile and today's Islam consists mainly of religious endogamy, which is a form of exogamy for males but a prison for females, which are not allowed to pass through the endogamous mantle of Islam. And here we see the difference with early hominids and later Neanderthals: Islam blocks juvenile females the way to genetic diversity.



Blocking genetic diversity for females must be seen as a higher order time effect of human religion on sexual culture. Notice, only the first time derivative of sexual culture is natural and realistic. All higher order time derivatives will never become zero (striving to perpetual orgasm in Heaven) and will be magically confounded. As an example in the evolution inbreeding confounded with reincarnation into the (earthly) universe, whereby sufficient inbred bodies had to be made for all ancestors waiting for reincarnation. So, there is no natural relation between inbreeding and reincarnation, but there is irrational relation between inbreeding and the fiction of ancestors to reincarnate into inbred bodies of the offspring.





Assumption 260Breaking sadomasochism in Islam.

Sadomasochism is a temporary super instinct formed from the killer instinct and the sexual instinct. As a Gestalt, sadomasochism is more than its constituent parts. In their interaction killer instinct and sexual instinct may easily intensify SM causing an extremely dangerous cocktail. 


SM-dyad is the blueprint of the relationship between husband and wife in Islamic culture. Then, if sexual tension hits over the edge SM will break into murder and sexual lust, leading to the kill of the sexual partner.


For the full experience of lust from breaking sadomasochism, murder and rape must take place together in smooth wave. Then we deal with natural psychopaths. But in Islamic culture Muslim males grow up as cultural psychopaths. This means murder and sexual lust can be split institutionally, as follows:

In SM-dyad the deadly victim to be can always be predicted in advance. It is the woman who will be killed, but she is not always sexually molested and raped. We know in Islam victims are mostly 'other sexual roles' : homosexuals, women, children, animals and non-believers. Remember, non-believers are from a different tribe or they do not adhere tribal religion, which is a form of sexual identity.  

Though SM decomposes into murder and sexual lust, in Islam we mostly don't see sexual molestation and rape factually. Examples of broken SM-dyads are stoning of 'adulterous' women and honor killings. 

In Islamic culture it is the sexual embedding of the killer instinct which focus the kill on the sexual partner, mostly the woman. But if the woman is not raped or sexually molested and the kill is an institutional process, what then is the fun for the public? What makes the SM decomposition into murder and sexual lust so fascinating for the crowd?


It is the sight of stoning which is attractive for the Islamic public. Muslims come in large numbers to enjoy the transition state of the struggling victim from life to death. Nobody is really interested in the living subject itself or in its dead human body afterwards. It is the transition process that arouses sexual lust in the public. 


So humans are fascinated by the transition state as well as by factually taking part in murder and rape. But remember, there are a lot of unclear interactions after 7 million years of lustful practice.


In concluding: When 'other sexual roles' are slaughtered by Sharia or the Koran it is sexually based sentencing, born from sadomasochism. Breaking sadomasochism into murder and sexual lust is an institutionalized bonus for Muslim males. People are fascinated by the transition process as well as by factual murdering and rape. It is the exercise of supreme power over a struggling living subject into a dead and objectified human body. It is the 'no escape objectivation' of 'other sexual roles', it is the ultimate satisfaction found in the complete humiliation of a human subject, it is the sick crown on human sexuality and the fundamental characteristic of Islamic culture.



Assumption 261: Breaking sadomasochism.
The sexually instigated kill of a victim signifies the transition from SM-dyad into its broken state of murder and sexual lust. Murder always takes place within SM-dyad. Sexual lust as rape can happen before or after breaking up SM-dyad.


Assumption 262:
In Islam, breaking sadomasochism into murder and sexual lust is an institutionalized process. When 'other sexual roles' are slaughtered after Sharia law it is sexually based sentencing, born from sadomasochism. It looks like murdering 'other sexual roles' keeps on fascinating Muslims who always come in big numbers and never seem satisfied.


Assumption 263 : Murder always takes place within SM-dyad and not after breaking this dyad, since the death of the victim signifies this transition. Just at the very moment the victim dies the spell is broken. So, murder is the factual breaking of SM-dyad. This means murder itself is sadism within SM-dyad and rape within a necrophilic context falls after breaking it. But this means the fun of breaking lies completely within SM-dyad itself, since only within SM-dyad the whole is more than the parts. Beyond that rape it is just plain rape.


Assumption 264: The split of SM-dyad into murder and sexual desire is established by the death of the victim. This does not mean the murderer had the intention to split up SM-dyad. On the contrary, he just combines rape and strangling to take full advantage of SM-dyad, where the whole is more than the parts.



Assumption 265:
Matthew 5:44
King James Bible Jesus:
But I say unto you, Love your enemiesbless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

Muslims come in Heaven by killing unbelievers, Christians being killed by unbelievers.


Assumption 266: Infanticide.
In the animal world infanticide is a religious measure taken by males planning to promote genetic immortality in the offspring of females from which they first kill earlier young to make them sexually receptive.


Assumption 267: Perpetual orgasm is a religious interpretation of sexual orgasm.


Assumption 268: Genetic immortality is a religious interpretation of genetic propagation.


Assumption 269: Perpetual orgasm.
The interaction between the normal sexual instinct (genetic immortality) and the accompanying human sexual cultural instinct (inbreeding and incest) delivered the well known human male drive 'perpetual orgasm'. Perpetual orgasm started as 'pedophilia in this lifetime' and explicitly splits the sexual instinct into genetic propagation and sexual lust.


Assumption 270: Infanticide by animals proves genetic male immortality goes before sexual lust, since males do not kill their own offspring to make the mother sexually receptive again.


Assumption 271: The honor syndrome is a complex of phenomena representing the now unconscious 'reincarnation into the earthly universe', what is forbidden in Islam as a mortal sin. It contains a range of phenomena from honor killings to lighter forms of honor revenge as honor rape and honor harassment by other family members.


Assumption 272An honor killing is the extreme of the honor syndrome scale. This syndrome is determined by the theoretical domain of 'reincarnation into the earthly universe'. All atrocities forthcoming from the parental wish to reincarnate into the earthly universe by the inbred of their offspring, which results in child murder (Filicide) are to be seen as honor killings with or without evidence of forced marriages, which latter is no indicator but just another symptom of the honor syndrome. 

This means the cause of honor killings is not only the refusal of an arranged marriage, but can also be dating with non-Muslims, loss of virginity, abortions and for example having a Western lifestyle. In conclusion, all events threatening the inbreeding and incest cult of the parents concerning reincarnation into the earthly universe can in principle lead to honor killings.


Assumption 273: Honor killings and forced marriages in inbreeding cultures are not unambiguously causally chained as both are just symptoms of the unconscious domain of 'reincarnation into the earthly universe'. This has great consequences for the trial of honor killings, as these can also be caused by dating non-Muslims, loss of virginity, abortions or having a Western lifestyle and the like. 


Assumption 274In a number of cases family counsels may give rise to honor killings but are never the cause. Both, counsels and killings are symptoms of the honor syndrome without unambiguous causal relation.


Assumption 275: Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) is a religious instrument of African cultures, which will likely develop into outbreeding societies, just because they are no notorious inbreeding cultures like Islam. But until now inbreeding cultures made much more progress in their outer layer of religious endogamy, where males and females have about the same rights to choose an Islamic partner.


Assumption 276On leaving Africa inbreeding cultures likely entered a harsh desert like environment in the Levant or on the Arabian Peninsula, which changed sexual culture and religion dramatically. Desert life facilitated rigid cultures with order and regularity needed for inbreeding across generations. In later period increased tribal density caused to enlarge the number of inbred bodies to outnumber neighbouring hostile tribes with reincarnated ancestors. A regular society and the need for population growth were impetus for the notorious incubator farms of family semen which are still characteristic for nowadays Islam.


Assumption 277The last possible origin of cousin marriages lies in the Arabian Peninsula about 50,000 years ago, where first human families (mtDNA =L3N) could not exchange fresh juvenile females with other tribes and desperately had to find new formulas to exchange females within just a few families. This measure from the time derivative of sexual culture might have become instinctive 'religion' for Muslims.


Assumption 278: About 40.000 years ago Homo sapiens (mtDNA = L3N) returned from the Arabian Peninsula and Europe to North Africa, where they developed as Berbers or Imazighen.


Assumption 279: For Muslims the Sacrifice Feast unconsciously means the escape from Heaven in the parallel universe and permission to follow their basic instinct to reincarnate into the earthly universe.


Assumption 280: Three elements likely caused the emergence of the Muslim instinct, which is male as well as female kin bonded in nuDNA to inbreeding and incest. This mutational abnormality is unprecedented in other inbreeding cultures, which are only bonded in the male lineage and where females are refreshed completely every generation (chimps, bonobos, Australopithecus africanus, Neanderthals and Aboriginals). This can be seen from mtDNA which is the same for males but different for females, which also have different nuDNA:

1: Inbreeding promotes tribal identity by genetic immortality in descendants since the Homininae (7 Ma; 400cc), the primal human-creature religion. Tribal identity revives in Muslim cultures in Western society today. Tribal identity is male and female kin bonded.

2: And since Homo erectus (2 Ma; 900cc) inbreeding also promotes the earthly reincarnation of Muslim fathers into descendants of their children.

3: And last but not least on the Arabian Peninsula (50 ka; 1400cc; mtDNA L3N) inbreeding was the only way to survive without the possibility to exchange fresh juvenile females. Nowadays perpetuation of this behavior despite adequate fresh juvenile females indicates an inbreeding-instinct mutation.

In the Arabian Peninsula, 50 thousand years ago, there were no other people and there was no central public administration and therefore these 150 pioneers lost track of juvenile descendants of the group. Likely sub-tribes fanned out across the Peninsula in a very early stage and did not keep track on each other. They must have built a symbolic wall around their own subgroup (endogamous tribal mantle) and let no uncontrolled females escape to other groups. So, they must have developed their notoriously hostile relations among Bedouin tribes already in an early stage of evolution.


                                                  ---------------------------


Assumption 281The eternal identity of the tribe is male kin bonded and maintained only along the male gene line in the offspring.  Thus, seed from aliens as the Serpent in a tribal woman as Eve does not belong to the tribe and must be eliminated or expelled. Adam, who recognized the fruit of the Serpent as his own child, was the stupidity at its best. Both Adam, Eve and the child of the Serpent were expelled. That's the original meaning of the Myth of Paradise as initiation rite and as severe warning for maturing boys.

And this is what 'God' said to the Serpent:

http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Genesis-Chapter-3/

15 And I will put enmity between thee [the Serpent] and the woman [Eve], and between thy seed [your tribe] and her seed [her tribe]; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.



Assumption 282: Homo naledi is a hybrid between Australopithecus and more advanced hominins. According to the male kin bonded inbreeding theory, fertilization of alien females was only permitted if they were held outside the tribe. Because more advanced hominins had longer legs and could run faster, they made it a sport to rape Australopiths in the open. But if this is true then Homo naledi evolved into real hominins already within several millennia. Then the species found in Dinaledi chamber must be a temporary and transitional form. And that means there must be an upper limit to the existence of this hybrid. Then, they cannot be younger than about two million years.



Assumption 283: Policor

Policor is a worldwide movement to undermine Western culture. Nowadays representatives are the EU, the globalists and the Democratic Party of the United States. Policor started with Romanticism (Rousseau) as built-in movement of the Enlightenment. The latter failed to formulate rules to discriminate between cultures, on which Romanticism judged all cultures equal and equivalent. In fact, the Enlightenment gave the impulse to the destruction of Christianity. In the twentieth century the Frankfurter Schule proclaimed the destruction of Western culture, followed by Marxist relativism or - nihilism. Later on 'all cultures are equal and equivalent' culminated into multiculturalism. The underlying idea was to establish a world government of globalists which could benefit from an army of cheap laborers (deplorables, irredeemables). Hillary Clinton is the latest representative of American policor. To accelerate the destruction of Western culture the EU destroyed the Nation States of Europe and negated democracy. Eurocrats call democracy: 'populism'. A further goal is to set up refugee flows to erase the identity of the European culture. Policor attracts criminals, fraud and corruption and consists of sexual deviant groups which find in Islam a shining example.



Assumption 284: Honor killings and acid attacks are caused by Muslims trying to obey the wishes of the ancestor fertility gods. These do not want to reincarnate into hybrids and bastards of Eve with that alien Serpent. And if they refuse to reincarnate the family dies out and family members cannot reincarnate. That's why families always form a closed front to kill the fallen daughter. 


Assumption 285: Religion is any intervention in sexual culture by not logically founded measures. 



Assumption 286: As a rule of thumb inbreeding measures on sexual culture are illogical measures based on magical thinking, while outbreeding measures are based on rational thought.


Assumption 287: In millions of years the Homininae (7 Ma; 400cc) refined their inbreeding culture by religion called 'genetic immortality' but tragically they optimized 'phenotypically controlled mortality'. They optimized inbreeding into fertility stress.

Natural outbreeding is involved in genotypes, while inbreeding is more focused on phenotypes. It reflects human males' Narcissistic vanity to mirror themselves in tribal lookalikes, while neglecting homozygous genes with identical alleles coding for the same trait.


Assumption 288: For Muslims accepting homosexuality comes down to accepting childless gays and a two dimensional State in which Mosque and State are separated and Allah lost his autocracy.



Assumption 289: Islam looks like an autosomal recessive disorder.


Assumption 290: Policor and anti-policor are exogamous and endogamous lusts.



Decomposition of SM-dyad

SM-dyads are broken up in next scenario:

Assumption 291: The break-up of SM-dyad into its components presupposes extreme tension. In Islam there is an enduring conflict between the conscious and the unconscious of Muslim males. Without tension persons must be psychopaths. 

First step:


Assumption 292: Masochism hate is the hate for unprocessed and despised female masochism in the conscious of Muslim males. Female masochism is not understood empathically. It causes cognitive dissonance with the unconscious on which it is beaten out of females in the conscious. Cognitive dissonance indicates cultural psychopathy, otherwise we speak of natural psychopathy.


Second step:

Assumption 293: Masochism fear concerns the fear for unprocessed and not understood empathy with females in the subconscious of Muslim males.

Third step:

Assumption 294: Masochism hate changes into masochism fear when Muslim males risk to grasp female masochism as a genuine and respectable feeling.

Fourth step:

Assumption 295: The generation of excessive female masochism causes empathy with females to move from the unconscious into the subconscious of Muslim males.

Fifth step:

Assumption 296: Muslim males fear to be convinced by their subconscious regarding the legitimacy of female masochism. They fear to lose absolute monotheistic power by accepting 'other sexual roles' as polytheism.

Sixt step:

Assumption 297: The break-up of SM-dyad into murder and sexuality sends the conflict with the subconscious back to the unconscious and prevents the acknowledgement of females as human subjects.

Seventh step:

Assumption 298: For cultural psychopaths the break-up of SM-dyad into murder and sexuality by Sexual Scales of Religion can also be seen as legitimate compensation for undelivered sexual pleasure by females within SM-dyad.



Assumption 299 All human religions originate from THE SAME primal Homininae religion of inbreeding. All higher order time derivatives - which are mostly based on magical thinking - offer religious instruments which led to the well known range of human religions in history.


Assumption 300: Human religion.

On religion we distinguish the existence of God and the religious process. Insofar as believers consider God as an entity in a parallel universe, we cannot confirm or falsify this hypothesis. But the religious thought process exists entirely in our reality, by which it is fully subject to universal logical laws.

This means we are free to build an analogy between human religion and animal sexuality, by which we start from scratch about 20 million years ago with mammals living in groups together. We know religious processes are constraint by the difficulty of their concepts. This means we can trace back the order of development of religious concepts since the Homininae (7 Ma; 400cc). This order is fundamental in the explanation of human religion.

Next, we determine the influence of previous stages on later religious concepts. We estimate the degree of confounding and contamination in the interactions. Then we decide which religions are most affected by uncontrolled interactions with former religious concepts. We will conclude to disastrous effects for Islam. Finally, we conclude religious trends can be better predicted from sexuality than from religion. Therefore religion will be concluded as a subset of the sexual domain.


Assumption 301: The first order time derivative of sexual culture (inbreeding), led to pedophilia as religious measure rewarding males for accepting inbreeding, in which they lost sexual freedom and were forced to copulate with their cousins.


Assumption 302: Perpetual orgasm is the refined eternal version of pedophilia, originating from sexual culture (inbreeding).



Assumption 303Perpetual orgasm is derived from a magical time derivative of pedophilia, perpetuating orgasm as eternal variant of pedophilia.



Assumption 304Religious interventions on sexual culture are always rational and realistic since they change the visible effects of first order time derivatives.


Assumption 305: With rational religious measures we mean the pursuit of realistic effects on sexual behavior AND the expectation of realistic results (rewards) from these effects given in the universe. 


Assumption 306: With irrational religious measures we mean the pursuit of realistic effects on sexual behavior AND the expectation of unrealistic or magical results (rewards) from these effects, which are expected in some other universe.


Assumption 307: We think religious interventions are meant to steer sexual culture on the basis of first time order derivatives of sexual culture. Therefore religious interventions always aim for realistic effects. But religious expectations (rewards) from these effects can be realistic (in this universe) or unrealistic or magical (in some other universe).



Assumption 308: A species survives if sexual selection and natural selection are in line.


Assumption 309: Religious measures - like courtship contests of birds - must lead to sufficient genetic variation as a necessary condition for survival of the fittest.


Assumption 310Survival of a species implies genetic diversity. But genetic diversity  is no sufficient condition for survival. 




Assumption 311Religious measures without sufficient genetic variation nor the condition of survival of the fittest, lead to phenotypical forms of inbreeding which give no guaranty for survival.


Assumption 312: Religious measures of animals which survived as a species just accidentally selected sufficient variation and fulfilled the demands of survival of the fittest. A lot of species must have died out because of selecting inadequate religious rules



Assumption 313

Within species there are two kinds of individual selection:

1: Sexual selection:
   - Sexual attraction: survival of the most attractive.
   - Sexual religion: survival of the most religious.

2: Natural selection: 
    - Survival of the fittest: survival of the most adaptive.
    
Natural selection works both between and within species.



Assumption 314: Religion plays a role in sexual culture if it differentiates between individuals.



Assumption 315 If religion steers sexual culture it is a form of breeding.



Assumption 316: If religion steers sexual culture, there is no fundamental difference in breeding dogs or women. This means human religion is an ordinary form of breeding.



Assumption 317If religion is a kind of breeding it varies on the scale from inbreeding over interbreeding to outbreeding.


Assumption 318: If religion is a kind of breeding then Islam is inbreeding and Christianity is outbreeding.


Assumption 319: There is no fundamental difference between animal sexuality and human religion. Both strive to propagate their genes to eternity with rational and irrational means. Thereby, human males generally misuse the female sexual attraction process for non-sexual purposes as the distribution of the inheritance and the like. 


Assumption 320: There is an important difference between inbreeding and the inbreeding instinct. Actual Inbreeding is bound to tribal and family endogamy. It goes over into outbreeding from tribal endogamy to ethnic endogamy into religious endogamy. At last, inbreeding becomes kind of outbreeding within the Muslim domain. But the inbreeding instinct is an inherited Muslim trait for millions of years, which can only be diluted by merging Muslims with non-Muslims. Therefore we might see a decrease of actual inbreeding in the Muslim population without the disappearance of the inbreeding instinct as long as Muslims do not merge with non-Muslims. For example in the religious endogamy of the Muslim culture we find a lot of outbreeding accompanied by the inbreeding instinct. That's why Sadia Sheikh (Belgium), Gülsüm Selim (Germany) and Mirjam Abarkan (Netherlands) were murdered within the religious endogamy of Islam. Sadia Sheikh and Gülsüm Selim concern tribal (family) endogamy, but the slaughter of Mirjam Abarkan is a pure case of the inbreeding instinct without real inbreeding.



Assumption 321Chrislam is an impossible match for Islam, which will lose its inbreeding instinct by mingling with non-Muslims. Muslims don't recognize this instinct as their overall-identity. Also, horny policor females in Western society are unaware of sexual motives while yearning for sadomasochistic strangulation. Both parties jump blindfolded into a vortex of lust, splitting Western culture into parallel societies after civil war.



Assumption 322As long as Muslims do not merge with other peoples, the inbreeding instinct is unaffected and will restore inbreeding and incest as sexual trait in future situations.


Assumption 323: 'Genetic diversity' is promoted by giving all members of a population freedom of procreation. 


Assumption 324: The outbreeding instinct is the lust for genetic diversity. 


Assumption 325: Religious compartmentalization. 
Socio-religious compartmentalization is seen as the reduction of the public opinion (total religious variance of n-individuals) into a few religious tendencies (main effects). If this panoply of Christian religions (endogamous cores) disappears, society is left with millions of individual opinions which are uncontrolled and cannot easily be steered by. 
Additionally, individuals are confirmed in their personal opinions by visiting only websites of their own kind. This way Isis has become the new endogamous core of young Muslims on the Internet. 
So, formerly an n-dimensional individual space of n degrees of freedom was reduced to a m-variable space of about five sorts of Christianity, which was reduced further to one main factor, namely Christianity. 
But today we see the reversal of the clustering of opinions. Reduction of degrees of freedom fails miserably and n-individuals really need an n-dimensional space to express themselves. 
But this simply means any reduction of information - e.g. the forming of compromises - has become nearly impossible. People are confirmed and bolstered in crazy opinions by new endogamous cores, e.g. their beloved weblogs. 
In the first place, we know Christianity will degenerate into individualism in a natural way. Secondly, the state of the art of communication creates billions of bits of information which are nearly impossible to integrate. 
Thus, the inability of society to reduce abundant individual information leads to a Babel-like confusion, which will cause numerous unsolvable conflicts ending in civil war.






cc-by-nc-sa





This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.

No comments:

Post a Comment