Monday, 5 December 2016

(117) The Myth of Abraham: The birth of God

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive






The Myth of Abraham

We know in the Tanakh Eve ate from the Tree of Knowledge (the Tree of Outbreeding)
But in the Koran Adam ate from the Tree of Life (the Tree of Inbreeding):
(The Quran, Surat Taha [20:120])
Sahih International

Then Satan whispered to him; he said, "O Adam, shall I direct you to the tree of eternity and possession (power, kingdom) that will not deteriorate?"

Notice, 'possession' correctly indicates the earthly universe, meaning this tree of eternity (living forever (sleep forever), genetic immortality in descendants, rebirth or earthly reincarnation) is wrong and leads not to eternal life in Heaven of the parallel universe. So, the Tree of Life in the Koran does not point to eternal life in the parallel universe.






In the Tanakh Adam was allowed to eat of all the trees in the garden except from the Tree of Knowledge. So the Tree of Life was permitted to eat from. God's remark to eat freely from this Tree of Inbreeding (Tree of Life) refers to genetic immortality in descendants by inbreeding. But this was the primal God of the first human creatures before the invention of reincarnation (Homininae (7 Ma; 400cc)). This must be the original meaning of the narrative. That's why this Jewish version in the Tanakh likely is very old and authentic:







So, the struggle between the universes is the real meaning of the Myth of Abraham and informs us about the unrest which the invention of the parallel universe has caused since Homo sapiens (200 ka; 1400cc).

African tribes believed in God, living in the parallel universe but did themselves reincarnate into the earthly universe. By the love of Jesus later humans let themselves be seduced also to reincarnate into the parallel universe. But fear and hatred for Allah made it a curse for Muslims. It made them Heaven to Hell. 

Forcing Muslims to believe in Heavenly reincarnation while forbidding earthly reincarnation defines the horrible power of the sexual dictatorship of Islam. And that's why Muslims desperately regress to the Sacrifice Feast every year, when they unconsciously celebrate their liberation from Islam and their return to earthly reincarnation:





Assumption 279: For Muslims the Sacrifice Feast unconsciously means the escape from Heaven in the parallel universe and permission to follow their basic instinct to reincarnate into the earthly universe.







-----------------------



2 And he said, Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of.

And they came to the place which God had told him of; and Abraham built an altar there, and laid the wood in order, and bound Isaac his son, and laid him on the altar upon the wood.

10 And Abraham stretched forth his hand, and took the knife to slay his son.

12 And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son from me.

16 And said, By myself have I sworn, saith the LORD, for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not withheld thy son, thine only son:


                                               --------------------------------------


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eid_al-Adha

Eid al-Adha (Arabicعيد الأضحى‎‎ ʿīd al-aḍḥā, [ʕiːd ælˈʔɑdˤħæː], "Festival of the Sacrifice"), also called the "Sacrifice Feast", is the second of two Muslim holidays celebrated worldwide each year, and considered the holier of the two. It honors the willingness of Ibrahim (Abraham) to sacrifice his son, as an act of submission to God's command. Before he sacrificed his son God intervened by sending his angel Jibra'il (Gabriel), who then put a sheep in his son's place. The meat from the sacrificed animal is divided into three parts: the family retains one third of the share; another third is given to relatives, friends and neighbors; and the remaining third is given to the poor and needy.





Islam is a monotheistic religion. Allah is God in Heaven of the parallel universe. There can be no other gods in any universe. Muslims can only reincarnate into Heaven. 
That is why their old faith of reincarnation into descendants in the earthly universe by inbreeding is banned on pain of deathAnd therefore Abraham had to kill his only son Isaac. Then the cycle of earthly reincarnation was definitely interrupted.

Islamic monotheism is enforced on pain of death and earthly reincarnation as major reinforcer of the inbreeding instinct has gone underground into the unconscious of Muslims: 

Operant responseinbreeding
Primary reinforcing stimulus: genetic immortality in the offspring'
Secondary reinforcing stimulusreincarnation into the (earthly) universe
Tertiary reinforcing stimulusreincarnation into the parallel universe

But the Sacrifice Feast is contrary to this prohibition and is therefore celebrated with intense joy every year. Somehow reincarnation into descendants is approved anyway. If Muslims realized the real meaning of the Sacrifice Feast it would have been forbidden officially.





The Sacrifice Feast is a strong reinforcement of inbreeding and incest and is one of the strongest examples of the hidden mixing of universes in Islamic culture, which underlines the awkward interactions between the different stages in the evolution of this faith.

BTW, did you know Muslims are the only believers celebrating the Sacrifice Feast? 
Why a worldwide feast for such a simple myth? Why not Jews and Christians? Think about it...

Would the Western world celebrate a clearly psychotic father who was able and willing to kill his own son?  Without God's intervention Abraham had committed an honor killing. So Abraham is definitely to blame.

Is there any difference with the brutal murders on Gülsüm Selim, Sadia Sheikh and Mirjam Abarkan? Is killing your own blood your own responsibility or can you hide behind a hypothetical God to give free reign to parental sexual lusts? Even animals protect their young to death. This feast is sick. 






Well, if Abraham lay down on the stake and ordered Isaac to set him on fire because he wanted to prove his faith in God, yes, then I would participate in this Sacrifice Feast too.


The birth of God

In the animal world mating between pairs of individuals takes place in genetic diversity. Then there is no need for God:





But where mammals live in groups together there arises 'God'. 





God is the endogamous core which dictates norms and values of sexual culture of the group. These norms and values are derived from a set of higher order time derivatives of sexual culture and are called 'religion':





'God' is the leader of the group and 'religion' is the relation between genetic diversity and genetic monoculture:





'Religion' is the balance between inbreeding and outbreeding, between endogamy and exogamy:





So, 'God' arises where mammals live in groups together and additional rules are needed not to extinct:





Human religion is basically down to earth and concerns the kind of breeding, which is indicated by the strongest male, which wants to copulate with all females, what is called genetic monoculture:





 While the female instinct demands for genetic diversity:





The animal world is lucky since no real inbred is created by the Alpha male, which is the strongest and healthiest male. For, his reign is only limited to his strongest years. Younger males will compete with "God" and eventually take his place. God is a sexual ideal projection of males into the Alpha male, something to strive to compete to become the strongest male. This is the healthy model of worshipping God. Of course, otherwise they would have died out. 






And so the notion of 'God' arose in the evolution of higher mammals, which resulted as the 'god concept' in the nerve cells of their brains. 




In the mammal world females join these groups out of free will and if they adulterous mate with foreign males, only the latter will be punished.





So, in the Alpha male model there naturally arises a balance between inbreeding and outbreeding, because 'other sexual roles' take their chance for genetic diversity. We call this the healthy breeding model:








Homininae with their inbreeding culture




But with the Homininae (7 Ma; 400 cc) everything went wrong. These slow bipedals were forced to inbreeding and incest in an unnatural way without sufficient exchange of juvenile females with other tribes. 

This sick sexual culture was sanctioned and promoted by religion, which is derived from a set of higher order time derivatives of sexual culture:





It must be said the first Homininae and Panini exchanged juvenile females with other tribes, since otherwise they already would have died out. Most of them died out:






Neanderthals likely died out because the forest shrunk in last Ice age, which made it impossible to connect the last remaining Neanderthal tribes.

We can see the exchange of juvenile females with nowadays chimps and bonobos, with Neanderthals and Aborigines:





And we are pretty sure of some Homo erectus:


http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110601/full/news.2011.338.html

Teeth from ancient human ancestors suggest that females joined new social groups once they reached maturity.


A chemical analysis of australopithecine fossils ranging between roughly 1.8 million and 2.2 million years old from two South African caves finds that teeth thought to belong to females are more likely to have incorporated minerals from a distant region during formation than those from males.


"What that's telling us is that the females grew up somewhere else and they died in the caves," says Julia Lee-Thorp, an archaeological scientist at the University of Oxford, UK. 







Paranthropus robustus (2 Ma; 400cc)

A 2011 study using ratios of strontium isotopes in teeth suggested that Australopithecus africanus and P. robustus groups in southern Africa were patrilocal: females tended to settle farther from their region of birth than males did.











Islamic inbreeding and incest culture

But with the advent of the third Paradise culture (Islam) inbreeding problems went terribly wrong. It is caused by the mixing of the universes: 








In the first place Muslim males see themselves as 'Alpha males' (tribal heads) in tribal endogamy which were not replaced by stronger males and so families inbred for many, many generations in succession:







Many inferior males created a deviant population for many generations and natural selection was obstructed in a very sick way, with lots of autosomal recessive disorders:


https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/inheritance/inheritancepatterns






Second, they forbade females to mate with foreign males (read: non-Muslim males) what accelerated inbred failures enormously. Imprisoning females within Islamic culture must be seen as the major and fundamental failure in Islamic breeding:






Muslims oppressed 'other sexual roles' what made their culture insane:



How men subdue women in SM-dyad:





Woman stoned by honor killing for refusing marriage with her cousin.






This all ruined the former Alpha male model to a degenerated fiasco which influenced natural selection in a very negative way, creating an inbred population deformed by natural selection with too many sadistic males and an over-representation of masochistic females:




It created Islamic culture:






The relation between man, God and the unconscious

Believers think Allah is the Highest Moral Authority who commands norms and values:





But this is weird and notice what happened with the male attitude to God changing from polytheism to monotheism: In polytheism males competed with the Alpha male (God) on a level playing field to be the strongest male:




Gods were respected in the days of the old Greeks, but it would be far fetched to think they were the mirror of human norms and values. Like sexual roles, Greek gods demonstrated also very bad and immoral behavior, what was disputed and condemned by believers.

This means Greek gods did not suit well to recommend humans about how they should lead their life. In other words Greek gods were not the highest moral authorities in human society.

But in cultures as Islam, which oppress women as were they objects, there had to emerge an authority more impressive than the male sexual drive competing with the Alpha male. It had to be a God far rising above the man who used His Moral Authority to condemn adulterous women to death.

These roles, both originating from the mind of the same Muslim male are inconsistent. In his unconscious the male competes with 'God' on a level playing field, while in the conscious SUPER EGO he crawls to God in an almost homo-erotic submissive relationship. He moans with the buttocks up and got rid of his last shred of masculinity from polytheism. Females are rightly not allowed during this embarrassing prayer. It must be said with Christians we see the same embarrassing sado (God) masochistic (male believer) relationship.

We must conclude Allah - seen as SUPER EGO - and the Alpha male projection both originate from the unconscious of Muslim males. This unconscious part of the mind commands them to split their God delusion into the inherited down to earth Alpha male and a fake Higher Moral Authority in the SUPER EGO, which condemns females to death.



Then we get this corrected religious model:




In conclusion

In polytheism sexual dictatorship had no power to terrorize the people. Belief in reincarnation into the earthly universe gave tribal heads complete power over their afterlife. Then they needed no parallel universe. 

So, in polytheism Bedouin tribes could not be united, but in monotheism all visible golden idols (the golden calf of Aaron) were forbidden on pain of death, as the first step to unite them under the God in the parallel universe. 
But to accomplish this definitely, the desert God in Heaven had to become a High Moral Entity from which all former tribal heads could derive superior moral power over other tribal members (read: women). 

So Muslim males have artificially split their minds into a down to earth Alpha male in the unconscious and a superior High Moral Entity in the SUPEREGO, from which they derive their fictitious authority.



The Myth of Abraham

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eid_al-Adha

Eid al-Adha (Arabicعيد الأضحى‎‎ ʿīd al-aḍḥā, [ʕiːd ælˈʔɑdˤħæː], "Festival of the Sacrifice"), also called the "Sacrifice Feast", is the second of two Muslim holidays celebrated worldwide each year, and considered the holier of the two. It honors the willingness of Ibrahim (Abraham) to sacrifice his son, as an act of submission to God's command. Before he sacrificed his son God intervened by sending his angel Jibra'il (Gabriel), who then put a sheep in his son's place. The meat from the sacrificed animal is divided into three parts: the family retains one third of the share; another third is given to relatives, friends and neighbors; and the remaining third is given to the poor and needy.



Muslims might think this is the current model:




Allah has primacy and commanded Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac.


But in our corrected model it is just the other way around:

It is the unconscious of Muslim males which does not want to give up inbreeding and incest. That's why the Alpha male (unconscious) lets God command in the SUPER EGO to sacrifice Isaac. Then next in the rebound, the same unconscious lets God command Abraham not to sacrifice his son

This is an excellent example of 'God' used to deceive the people, letting them think what their own unconscious wants them to conclude on the basis of the authority of God: Reincarnation in both universes can be combined and that's the real reason of the Sacrifice Feast:















cc-by-nc-sa






This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.



No comments:

Post a Comment