Tuesday, 24 February 2015

(34) Freedom of Speech

Basic Dimension





Assumption 214: Freedom of expression is a quality of the exogamous periphery of the group and is always indebted to the endogamous divine core. Therefore, there is no absolute freedom of expression other than subject to the prevailing basic morality.



Assumption 213: Group of higher mammals:

A group of higher mammals exists by virtue of the balance between endogamy and exogamy.

Its endogamous core consists of the power of the alpha male to fertilize all females. Hence, he basically establishes a genetic monoculture by inbreeding and incest, only serving the immediate survival of the group. But in the long run his genes will be over-represented in his descendants, unless competitive males in the exogamous mantle contribute to genetic diversity.

But tension also arises between the sexual desires of the dominant male and the females. Since females naturally tend to genetic diversity with other males. Hence, the exogamic outer layer consists of adulterous females chasing genetic diversity with other males and from other groups, what comes down to the permeability of the group.

For humans, the total permeability of the mantle depends on the relation between endogamous repulsion and exogamous attraction of external genes. This relation is the natural base of 'human religion'.
But only on the basis of inbreeding and incest (Islam) permeability is related to endogamy. Endogamous cores in completely permeable cultures as the Enlightenment are derived from other values. 





But precisely where cultural relativism mixed multiple moralities it created the fiction that freedom of speech needs no moral basis and can really be free. For moralities are blurred in amorality.





Moreover, as an additional complication making this understandable, cultural relativism just is meant to mask cultural absolutism, where Islam instead of Christianity has become the endogamous heart of Western culture. One more reason to realize the new prophet of policor should not be offended.





Insulting the prophet strikes the endogamous Muslim culture and policor in the heart. It is senseless to start a dialogue with Muslims about freedom of expression with cartoons of Mohamed, for it is impossible to change the endogamous core. One can better understand that the Muslim culture since 1400 years has a very weak mantle wherein endogamous tribalism is less represented.





Which means more effective measures can be taken. Without much objection trappings of Islamic faith in Western countries can be prohibited without causing much consternation. Numerous other measures can be taken to force the Islamic culture to follow the leading Western culture.






Much, much better the huge religious endogamous outer shell can be broken down, an outer mantel of more than one billion Muslims can be separated from their endogamous core of inbreeding and incest, and in time this will be automatically forced by their Red Giant. And that shell is formed by half by women pursuing genetic diversity naturally.
















Pure exogamies connected and swallowing each other can be infinitely large without changing shape. 









But endogamies as Islam come from tribal endogamy which already has been stretched to ethnic endogamy since Homo erectus and eventually will be completely diluted by religious endogamy.

But exogamies have an endogamous core too and therefore their nature determines how big a group can be.

And here we see the big difference between Western culture and Islam. Enlightenment of Western culture does not differentiate between people and therefore mixes easily with other cultures. 

But racist Islam distinguishes between Muslim males (subjects) and 'other sexual roles' (objects), included non-Muslims. And therefore the Islamic inbreeding and incest culture never will be mixed with other nations without giving up the endogamous racist faith.






Hence, one should not want to tackle the endogamous core in the prophet or Allah, but rather all manifestations of this abject culture in the periphery. This does not lead to heartfelt insults and is very effective, especially if the endogamous mantle eventually ceases to exist wherein hundreds of millions of women are imprisoned wishing to escape from the incest and inbreeding core.





But trying to offend the endogamous core as Western culture does, is stupid and counterproductive, for it presses the endogamous mantle back to the core.




Which means the correct ground dimension of religion very decidedly indicates how the SM-dyad of Muslims should be cleaved. 
This must be done exactly on the border of the endogamous core and the outer shell. But looking from Western exogamy, one plunges very stupidly on the holiest of holies of the opponent: the prophet or Allah, what presses the mantle back to the core.







Finally, insulting the prophet or Allah can be understood as the unconscious desire of Westerners - as exogamous block - to challenge the sexual endogamous power of Islam to be subjected eventually. And one sees that Muslims react exactly as predicted by theory.







                               

cc-by-nc-sa






This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.ce.

No comments:

Post a Comment