Tuesday, 2 September 2014

(0) Foreword to this blog

Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive


Wednesday, 24 September 2014





Mankind has ascribed special value to religion that transcends banality. We all know that with banality sexuality is intended. But religious discussions almost always have sexuality as central theme. For example, homosexuality and rules for female sexual behavior are hot items in monotheism.

The contrast between plain sex on the one hand and esoteric religion on the other has been created for only one reason: If religion could be explained by sexuality alone, then the existence of God could be eliminated since we always choose for the most parsimonious theory. But in this case that would be a fallacy, because the derivation of human religion from animal sexuality cannot falsify the existence of God in the parallel universe. What does not make His existence otherwise likely.

Therefore, we are left with a relation wherein people unconsciously feel that human religion has something to do with sexuality, what possibly torments their belief in God.


We define the power of religion as the potential difference between sexuality in the collective unconscious and religion in the conscious. Then we see that the difference between strong Islam and weak Christianity lies in the fact that the latter does not exploit testosterone:

Unconscious sexuality <=== power of religion ===> conscious religion









For believers and unbelievers, it is important to imagine how first Hominins
developed their religious thinking. This blog built its model in a rational and systematic way from the animal world. Nowhere do we claim the existence of God to support our theory. Statements regarding the existence of God are far beyond our scope. Finally, our Sexual Theory of Religion can be falsified in the universe.

Assumption 102: Monotheism is the sadomasochistic principal component of the overdetermined polytheistic space. The core of the desert religions is sadomasochism.





Assumption 77: Because the God of monotheism is defined as a known but unknown parameter (angle) of His Principal Axis in the space of gods, the system of equations of Paradise culture actually seemed unresolved. Nevertheless the n-space of tribes was reduced to a by tribal heads accepted single dimension: monotheism.
Knowing that hatred and hostility is the most common factor among Bedouin tribes, God and Allah must be based also on hatred and hostility. Hence, God and Allah are personifications of Sadism on the throne, and the real nature of monotheism must be sadomasochism.







Assumption 148: Inbreeding and incest is a human male instinct in endogamous populations. Outcrossing is a female instinct.


                                                           
                                                                                   

This blog is not interested in the existence of God. The key issue is how Hominins, Homo erectus and Homo sapiens discovered the timelessness derivative of sexuality to perpetual orgasm and eternal life and why they called this 'religion'.





This blog develops the notion of God from the alpha male of higher mammals. It traces religion back tens of millions of years in history. From there it rebuilds human religion in a rational and straightforward way. 









                                                                        




What is our strategy?

We will rewrite human religion deliberately within the framework of five types of eternal life with increasing difficulty. This means that we will supplement Genesis where it defaults:






Do we think God exists? May be. Can I read this blog as a believer. Of course, because if you really believe in God, then He was always there and then the leadership of the alpha male simply emerged from the template of God earlier formed in the animal brain. This blog therefore does not choose in a chicken-and-egg debate. So, besides it is badly written there are no obstacles to read this blog...




Disclaimer:

This article arose from the Sexual Theory of Religion. This is no scientific research. No conclusions about individual persons are possible. The theory is based solely on about 300 assumptions and therefore does not claim to have a sort of God-given truth. 









cc-by-nc-sa





This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.


No comments:

Post a Comment