Monday, 8 September 2014

(6) Masochism Hate, SM-dyad and Sexual Scales


Basic Dimension

http://sexualreligion.blogspot.com/ 

Number Archive

Monday, 7 July 2014








Sadomasochism

Animals show sadistic behavior but to really enjoy sadomasochism one must be human, because for real SM, empathy is essential. How much more would the cat enjoy if she realized how much the mouse suffered from his creaking skull.

In general, animals feel no empathy with their victims. Otherwise they would die out. But even if they were endowed with empathy, even then they would not come up with the idea of creating something very beautiful from the lust to kill and sexual desire: Sadomasochism is the icing on the cake of the sexual relationship between humans, husband and wife, in the SM-dyad

And in case animals would like it, their sadomasochism would be unstable. SM would quickly reset into killer instinct and sexual instinct. And that's because animals lack control to keep the lust to kill and sexual desire as a critical mass in the focal caught. 






An SM-dyad needs control, balance and stability between sadism and masochism.
But in most cases, sadists develop insufficient empathy in masochism. Sadism prevails and SM-dyad falls apart into murder and sexual lust.


Psychopaths





Psychopathic behavior is characterized by a lack of enforcement of certain moral standards. Lack of empathy is not a necessary condition. It might also be caused by missing conscience or disturbed conscience.

(1) empathic psychopaths
(2) autistic psychopaths
(3) cultural psychopaths

Empathic psychopaths (kind of sociopaths)
If only empathically limited persons were psychopaths, than we certainly were not intended. But if empathic captains of industry and politicians can also be sadistic psychopaths, than we get ourselves in the danger zone. Emotion-free psychopaths are easily identified, but empathic politicians off the hook. Hence, most psychopaths roam free in the tops of our society.

Assumption 169: In general, psychopaths are empathically well established and have a strong moral sense. However, they tragically attach less value to morality.

Precisely empathetic psychopaths, by exceeding moral norms without inner conflict, open windows to deception, to the lust to harm others. 



Autistic psychopaths
Sadism becomes dangerous with autistic psychopaths, who are missing the subtle understanding of the suffering of masochism. Sadomasochism becomes a psychiatric phenomenon if one loses control, and is unable to relativize SM. Then sadist and masochist both are sucked in the vortex of paraphilia. 

Cultural psychopaths
Cultural psychopaths are also dangerous in whom understanding of masochism has been suppressed.






Most concerning are cultural psychopaths, who are religiously indoctrinated and emotional suppressed in early childhood and to make matters worse are selected by inbreeding on the SM-scale for millions and millions of years. They are victims of endogamous cultures of inbreeding and incest: 









A sadomasochistic relation as the SM-dyad is only enduring when both parties experience lust. If Muslim women could overcome their masochistic lust, then it would be over with SM-dyad and Islam would eliminate itself, leaving us only with nine million years of extreme selection on sadomasochism. 

Sadism cannot exist without the kiss of masochism. In masochism, suffering is translated into lust. This lust keeps the Muslim culture in an iron grip and even women apparently cannot get rid of this paralyzing masochism. Sorrow and pain produce endorphin and become a lust in masochism. Sadists and masochists both enjoy the suffering of the masochist. Sadomasochism is a delight.


Religion as a vehicle of sadomasochism

Sadomasochism is a deeply hidden human lust. It manifests itself in the desire to hurt or to feel pain. It leads to both shame and pleasure. It is a fascinating form of sexuality and as such a major social taboo. 

Sadomasochism drenched all institutions of society. We not even notice any more. Humans are the filthiest sadists in the world; look at the animals that always flee just in time.

However, SM can be sublimated into loving attention and eroticism. Hence, man can learn to deal with it. 

It is the mother that instills her son's empathy for women. If she has no status in the family and is merely honored for submission, the son will become as his father.


Human religion is sadomasochism in disguise

By religion, sadomasochism fought a legitimate way out from the darkest depths of the human soul. Sadomasochism was accepted and facilitated because it was called 'religion'. Man put his sadism on the throne and worshipped it. He brought the offerings for fear of the terrible beast in him and tried to exorcise his sadistic God. Ritual and superstition haunted him all his life. 







Monotheism

The dimensionality of the space of gods is completed in early childhood by the enforced projection on culture. Then, it can be seen how many dimensions are available for the orthogonality of church and state and the separation of powers.




Under the Tawhid Islamic culture is one-dimensional. In our opinion, it concerns the SM-dyad in which the left side shows the male sexual ideal projection in Allah. Allah is a self-projection of Muslim males. On the right side, there are 'other sexual roles' that are seen as objects:








Assumption 167: Monotheism is the sadomasochistic principal component of the over dimensioned polytheistic space.






Masochism hate, Rosetta stone to Islam















In the animal world and in polytheism, males have a level playing field with the alpha male. If they become strong enough they can beat him.

Alpha male (hetero) ===> level playing field <=== hetero (male)

But in monotheism males developed a subordinate homo-erotic relationship to their not existing inner God:

God (hetero) ===> subordinate relation <=== (homo) Jesus

Allah (hetero) ===> subordinate relation <=== (homo) Muslim

Well, if God exists, I'm wrong, but what if God does not exist? Then we explain the need for male believers to split their minds in a fictive God and themselves in a sexual sense.

Then, men apparently need a symbolic sadomasochist relationship in which they occupy the submissive masochistic position and God that of sadistic tyrant. Praying becomes a homo-erotic masochistic lust, which must be fulfilled several times a day.

But flirting with masochism and homosexuality is life-threateningly for monotheistic believers. Look how they are seduced to praying and at the same time blackmailed by monotheism, which is exploiting masochism in a homo-erotic way. 
Homosexuality is the secret power of monotheism. 

Men are vaguely aware of this curious relation and are therefore susceptible to extortion and praying not to fall for masochistic homosexuality, because then they are also expelled from the group to God. They rave about their heterosexuality and are furious at gay men who are being hanged with lust

Recognition of homosexuality as the second God means the end of Islamic monotheism which then (like Jesus) must be transferred into two gods, into polytheism, followed by the separation of powers and the separation of mosque and state (Tunisia 2013). But that would break the supremacy of Allah. 

Muslims probably never will recognize homosexuality as their second God. It is also silly to teach homosexuality in secondary school. After early childhood the one-dimensionality of Islamic culture is a fact, too late for the second God, too late.



Jesus gave masochism a face again

Jesus as a full grown man developed a childish or homo-erotic relationship to his so called "Father". And that would not be as sick when it concerned his real father. But this Father was a fiction. The only explanation left in Sexual Religion could be his unconscious homosexuality.

Note that this site analyzes religion from sexuality. Hence, Jesus was the God of other sexual roles and pulled masochism back into the conscious of sadistic males. 






Jesus gave masochism her face again for healthier and stable SM-dyads, always formed in tetrads. And now we understand why He had to be the Son of God. That's because, only gods can claim sexual dimensions. And to be a God, Jesus had to become the anti-projection of male heterosexuality. He occupied the whole subspace of other sexual roles. Religion is not that complicated.








From then, sadistic Christian males had to process masochism consciously. They were not ashamed for masochism any longer. Hence, Christian males can imagine themselves in the masochistic role of other sexuality's very well. Christian males do not hate or kill people, just because of their frightening masochism. On the contrary.

In my opinion Jesus was the greatest figure in human history, because he abolished the distinction between subjects and objects and thereby created the second god dimension for other sexual roles in the conscious. Note, that Jesus is not seen as the second God of homosexuality but as the anti-projection of the total subspace orthogonal to male heterosexuality. 


Assumption 50: The polytheistic space of gods (in the archetype of God) exists of five sexual dimensions. With two dimensions, heterosexuality is opposed to other sexual roles. With five dimensions it concerns the following hierarchy:

1: First God: male heterosexuality. [Alpha male]
2: Second God: male homosexuality. [homosexual clergy]
3: Third God: female sexual roles.
4: Fourth God: pedophilia.
5: Fifth God: bestiality. 






In religious terms Jesus led the monotheism of Abraham back to polytheism with two gods






Later, the subspace of other sexual roles was divided into numerous other gods, such as female sexual roles, pedophilia and bestiality.  









And in this way multidimensional polytheism was redeveloped, which ultimately converges to atheism. Human religion can be described within five orthogonal dimensions, what means that thousands of human gods are interdependent.


Islamic space

But the Tawhid of Islam prohibits human gods. Therefore Muhammad can not be seen as a god in the conscious. But in the unconscious of Muslims he really functions as such. Incidentally, the image of Muhammad in the conscious is definitely not masochistic, another reason why he cannot occupy a second god dimension. 

Note that in Islam women are not allowed to have a female God, that's because they are objects in monotheism.







Note: The actual sadistic god of Islamic culture is not Allah but are tribal gods from Paradise culture. In the beginning Allah was intended as an escape from male sadism just like Christianity. This worked through Jesus in exogamous cultures, but failed due to endogamy among Muslims. Allah, the women god from the SUPER EGO and tribal gods of the ID were contaminated and clashed on the level playing field of the EGO of Muslims.




What now is seen as Allah in the Koran and Sharia is a failed women god, which has been occupied by men. Hence Islam psychologically knows a male Allah who is dominant and a female Allah who describes the inner life of women. This all because in monotheism there can be only one God. Allah must be understood as a multiple personality in Islamic culture. This is the cause of the sexual imbalance between man and wife: SM-dyad.


Assumption 181: The actual sadistic god of Islamic culture is not Allah but are tribal gods from Paradise culture. In the beginning Allah was intended as an escape from male sadism just like Christianity. This worked through Jesus in exogamous cultures, but failed due to endogamy among Muslims. Allah, the women god from the SUPER EGO and tribal gods of the ID were contaminated and clashed on the level playing field of the EGO of Muslims.

What now is seen as Allah in the Koran and Sharia is a failed women god, which has been occupied by men. Hence Islam psychologically knows a male Allah who is dominant and a female Allah who describes the inner life of women. This all because in monotheism there can be only one God. Allah must be understood as a multiple personality in Islamic culture. This is the cause of the sexual imbalance between man and wife: SM-dyad.


SM-tetrads

Dangerous stand-alone SM-dyad in Muslim culture:














Muslim tetrad: Female Muslims can try to force their position into male consciousness,
but they remain objects and are hardly seen as human beings. Hence in the conscious of male Muslims there is only one God, Allah, who is their sexual ideal projection in heaven with 72 exogamous virgins.








The Muslim religion 

Now, it is well known that kneeling bigots are in a masochistic relationship to their sadistic and terrifying God. 


Muslims are heterosexuals in their conscious projection on Allah, and they suppress their homosexual component in the unconscious, which contains also misunderstood masochism. What means that they project their own hatred against misunderstood masochism on other sexual roles, first making masochism manifest by oppression and abuse, then slaughtering the tortured bodies of their victims to get rid of misunderstood masochism.

We conclude that Muslims learned to reject weakness in other people (objects) who are not heterosexual Muslim males (subjects). Muslims learned to hate women, homosexuals, children and animals, and of course Jews who are animals too.


Assumption 87: Other sexual roles are homosexuals, women, children and animals. They are seen as objects. Finally we add ‘other religions’.

Jews have no brains, are pigs and masochists. In Jews Muslims project all their hatred against the outer world. It is the definition of hatred in a nutshell and gives a perfect projection of their complete failure to set up a decent, civilized society and an intelligent culture without inbreeding. 

But above all masochism is the only recognizable character trait that connects other sexual roles. That is the Achilles heel of Muslim psychiatry. Muslims are afraid of their own masochism. Masochism hatred is the Rosetta stone to Islam.

We already know that SM-dyads need balance and stability between sadism and masochism. In most cases, sadists develop also insufficient empathy in masochism. Then sadism prevails and SM-dyad falls apart into murder and sexual lust.


Now we see that Islamic culture has exactly the same problem of unstable SM-dyads, because male Muslims suppress the development of masochism by focusing unilaterally on sadism. Such psychopathy is caused by religious indoctrination and by a totally different composite population due to 9 million years of inbreeding and incest since the Homininae.







Super instinct 

Because only humans are able to truly sadomasochistic relations, sadomasochism is a typical human instinct. It is a super instinct composed of the killer instinct, the sexual instinct and a hint of cannibalism.

The reason for this super instinct is that the whole is greater than the parts. Sexuality fused with the lust to kill often gives more satisfaction than the drives apart. But this implies that this contrived super instinct can be dismantled again when the parts offer more pleasure than the whole.

The disintegration of the SM-dyad is made by a judicial decision of the sadist. This can be a personal decision that is sexually motivated or an official decision of sharia, which amounts to the same thing.

The process leading to the dissolution of the SM-dyad in the lust to kill and sexual desire is called the Sexual Balance of Religion or Sexual Scales of Religion:







Endogamic Sexual Model Islamic Culture:

It is our belief that this mechanism shows how Islamic culture works:






With this we have a template to predict which causes are leading to honor killings. We only have to deliver some theory:

Assumption 165: Honor killings can be predicted from the breaking up of SM-dyad by Sexual Scales of Religion.

But note that masochism hate is meant for the general Islamic model. It might not be as functional with honor killings. 

Breaking SM-dyad is much more profitable for fathers in Islamic culture, than in Paradise culture:
















The very basis of male religion in endogamous populations is eternal immortality and perpetual orgasm by inbreeding and incest. This was based on earthly reincarnation what was denied by Islam that only took over the SM-dyad of Paradise culture. But now burdens and benefits of sadomasochism became unbalanced in Islamic culture, making it more profitable for a number of Muslim fathers to dissolve SM-dyad in rape and murder on their daughters, an assessment process as determined with Sexual Scales of Religion.


Assumption 151The power of religion lies in the enhanced contrast between earthly and heavenly satisfaction of sexuality. Only the manipulation of sexuality can influence its religious derivative.

It is very likely that monotheism of Islam created this imbalance in SM-dyad purposely. Discontent in the unconscious of Muslim males can be converted in massive sexual aggression (read: war) at any time determined by the sexual dictatorship of Islam. Islamic culture therefore is no terrible accident, but a carefully designed and directed imbalance in the heads of male Muslims. 

Assumption 158: Cultures imposing unreasonable restrictions on sexuality are purposely promoting sexual desperation in men, who then build an extreme expectation of sexual orgasm in an unknown universe of hope.


Sexual Scales in Religion






The operation of the Balance of Religion



First we contrast Paradise culture with Islamic culture:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/613_commandments

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incest#Islamic

The Quran gives specific rules regarding incest, which prohibit a man from marrying or having sexual relationships with: his daughter.

The virginity of the daughter will be checked at marriage. If she ever had sexual intercourse before, the father would be blamed. If he really abused her, he would deny and possibly argue that she must have had intercourse with unknown persons. Then, he possibly kills his daughter "for the honor of the family". 

But on the other hand, well known intercourse within families probably would not be a big deal for cousins. Resulting children out sexual abuse would find shelter somewhere in the family tribe. Or they were aborted just in time.

We conclude that virginity is essential in ethnic and religious endogamy, where marriage candidates are not of the same tribe. It seems less important within families, within tribes.

Above situation is illuminated out of the sexual behavior of the father. Of course, the Coefficient of Inbreeding (C.O.I.) really matters, which is .50 between father and daughter and .0625 between cousins.



Penetration

In inbreeding cultures, law can be displayed in sexual terms. Within this model women are rewarded with sexual penetration and orgasm and punished without orgasm. 
Orgasm is the reward for participating in the inbreeding culture. It underlines the membership of women to the tribe. Adulterous outcrossing women who put eternal survival of the tribe
on the game no longer may participate in eternal orgasm and are killedIt sounds silly but we are speaking of nine million years of law enforcement where inbreeding and incest should be placed in a meaningful context

On the left side of Sexual Scales we see inbreeding and incest with sexual penetration and orgasm; on the right we see honor killings and stoning, what is penetration without orgasm, penetration with knives, ropes, stones, etc.  





Within the sexual domain, orgasm is the center of well-being for men. That's why women are evaluated in terms of orgasm.


 Penetration with orgasm (Paradise culture)

(This means inbreeding and incest with SM-dyad intact)

In Paradise culture inbreeding and incest were related to sexual intercourse.
Because SM-dyad was intact, even rape by physical proximity created a bond. It was the bond of the woman belonging to the group.










Penetration without orgasm (Paradise culture)

(This means honor killings with SM-dyad broken)

Below on the right, we see the SM-dyad broken into murder and pure sexuality. 

That meant murder in Paradise Culture but also the development of Vanilla-sex in Christianity, where pure sexuality remarkably developed into soft sex without a hint of the lust to kill.





















In Paradise culture, the right side displayed all types of murders. Women on this side were outcasts. They were banished, expelled and were murdered without experiencing orgasm. They were not penetrated by male sexual organs any longer, but were 
symbolically raped by intrusion of knives, by stones, bullets and ropes. Only men enjoyed sublimated orgasm and kept physical distance to the outcast.

The physical relation between husband and wife had to be demolished because she had to be expelled from the group. Therefore, women could not be raped first and strangled later. That would reinforce SM-dyad. Not the right message before their death.

Women were not to be touched any longer, that was the message, which was the rule of the tribe. Executioners were men throwing stones, while keeping firm distance and forming a group against the outcast. It is evident that stoning literally means expelling a member from the group by the group. Because by adultery, what often comes to refusal of inbreeding and incest, women threatened the eternal immortality of the tribe, what was a mortal sin (remember Sadia Sheikh*).


For this reason, the conventional penetration was replaced by a more violent and symbolic
variant: lust murder under side-conditions (broken SM-dyad). It touches the deepest fibers of sadomasochism. 

Orgasm with SM-dyad intact shows woman's surrender, but lust murder with SM-dyad broken shows her absolute defenselessness. Lust murder can become the superlative of male pleasure above sadomasochism. 

It is this lust inequality, this quality difference, making the sexual balance of religion remains in balanceThis is said to be worth the lust to kill, the price of a new woman.

Lust murder as a pinnacle beyond sadomasochism is the supreme satisfaction of the male instinct, whereby SM changes in sexually inspired murder.

Therefore, lust murder is the ultimate compensation for damage suffered. It transforms sexual orgasm into the orgasm of murder. It is a sufficient compensation for the loss of inbreeding and perpetual orgasm. That is the real meaning of the sexual balance of religion.





Penetration with orgasm (Islamic culture)

(This means inbreeding and incest (with cousins) and SM-dyad intact)

In Islamic culture sexual intercourse with daughters is prohibited. When SM-dyad is intact girls are protected against rape and murder by their father.


                                                               


In Paradise culture fathers were allowed to rape their daughters. By breaking SM-dyad
there was no lust or reason to rape them any longer. That would give the wrong signal of "warmth and intimacy". 


Penetration with orgasm and murder (Islamic culture)

(This means rape and murder with SM-dyad broken)

But in Islamic culture raping daughters is forbidden and their virginity will be checked at marriage. But when social structure collapses because daughters refuse arranged marriages, then their virginity does not matter any longer. 

Honor killings immediately after an abortion are suspect and indicate a tangle of potential conflicts. Did the father sexually abuse his daughter after his decision to decompose 
SM-dyad into rape and murder? Did he make her pregnant? Did she threaten to make this public? 

Are father and daughter checkmate? Because, he wants her to marry with her cousin, while she puts him under pressure because of his sexual abuse? Was the honor killing caused by panic? And why does the family agree with murder? To protect the "honor of the family"? Honor intended to protect tribal inbreeding, or a family crime to prevent the shame of the behavior of the father, her brothers and her uncle? How many tragic complications take the daughter to her grave?

By breaking SM-dyad a new world of sexual lust opens for fathers, brothers and uncles. By her breaking the code of inbreeding, daughters easily become the whore of the family. 


Sexual abuse creates a common family interest to prevent daughters from going to the police. The honor of the family will be offset against the shame of their collective rape of the fallen daughter. In a joint action to save the "honor of the family", daughters will be slaughtered after which family’s remains silent forever.

















In the following it will be shown that Islamic culture contains serious restrictions on male sexuality. Reincarnation and perpetual orgasm in the earthly universe are strongly prohibited as mortal sin. 


Assumption 168: Islam forbade reincarnation into the (earthly) universe. Hence, eternal orgasm in tribal afterlife was excluded. Not prohibited was inbreeding and perpetual orgasm in the parallel universe.

This creates sexual tensions that fuel the Islamic perpetual motion. The sexual joys of Paradise culture are suppressed in the collective unconscious, while Allah from the parallel universe, residing in the Super Ego, is calling the shots. Hence, male Muslims must be understood as yearning to realize their instincts from Paradise culture. 





Sadia Sheikh: (shot in the abdomen several times, died within three days)

http://desanimauxetdeshommes.hautetfort.com/archive/2008/03/21/le-texte-integral-de-l-emission-indices-sur-sadia-sheikh.html





cc-by-nc-sa




This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attibution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence.

No comments:

Post a Comment